[Lavindathar]

In reference too :

http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/...233393,00.html


Nice to see her get out there and be with her son, but the following quote confuddles me.

From Sky News He would not have harmed anyone - how could they have harmed him?" she asked.

Is it me, or this a stupid comment? If it's me, tell me as I just don't get it!

He was a solider, who would have attacked if needed.


He was shot by a solider. Who attacked.

Fair enough, he may not have hurt a fly in his every day civilian life, but aren't soldiers required to open fire if needed?

They did this to him as it's war.....I just dont get it.