Thread: BG1 vs. BG2
View Single Post
Old 09-18-2002, 01:56 AM   #4
Redblueflare
Galvatron
 

Join Date: May 9, 2001
Location: The backwoods in Georgia *sigh*
Age: 41
Posts: 2,151
Quote:
Originally posted by Willard:
BG1 all the way. I played it first, and it rocked! It was my first RPG, and I thought it was the greatest game ever. When I found out that I was a (spoiler if you have not finished the game!!! [img]tongue.gif[/img] )
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Child of Bhaal, I was so surprised! No wonder they had those chanters right next to the Candlekeep Library! In BG1, you felt proud killing a gibberling. Felling an ogre was a good day's work, and those ankhegs were some of the most challenging battles! In BG2 and ToB, you get up to level 40. You get so enormously powerful that fightning isn't really fun anymore. One hit with Carsomyr and that Ankheg goes flying. Now where is the fun in that? BG1 was definitely better, but if you played BG2 and ToB first, and then play BG1, it seems boring because you switch from battling gigantic Dragons to slaying kobolds. [img]tongue.gif[/img]
I disagree here. BG2! BG2! BG2! Come on Irenicus was so cool! More spells to play with, cooler weapons, cooler quests, what's not to like? I admit in TOB you did get *too* powerful but that's why they had stronger enemies than your ankhegs. (Greater basilisks were more annoying and rewarding anyway.) [img]tongue.gif[/img] Besides it's not like you didn't have to work to get there. Liche's, high level mages, dragons, and the evil one himself all lay in your way.
__________________
<br /><br />\"If you ever need me just whistle, and i\'ll come running. I promise. <img border=\"0\" title=\"\" alt=\"[Smile]\" src=\"smile.gif\" /> <br />Kupo, Kupo! A man can\'t get a sword if he can\'t dance! <img border=\"0\" title=\"\" alt=\"[Big Grin]\" src=\"biggrin.gif\" />
Redblueflare is offline   Reply With Quote