|
All he has to do is put forward the information that led to the theory, other scientists will have to find stuff to argue about, and judging by the responses here, there should be no shortage of those. I'm no scientist, nor do I play one on tv, but if I make enough careful observations of something, and draw conclusions based on those observations, that would be a theory. The problem is, the last time I did that, I was totally wrong. It was a theory, but it didn't hold up to other facts of which I was not aware.
|