Thread: smoking
View Single Post
Old 12-01-2004, 07:02 PM   #148
slicer15
Symbol of Cyric
 

Join Date: November 12, 2002
Location: Banstead, Southeast England
Age: 38
Posts: 1,162
johnny, that was discussed earlier, in regards to pub-waiter applicants having to answer the exact same thing...

Quote:
Originally posted by Aerich:
quote:
Originally posted by Landon Contressior:

However, on to the smoking section non smoking section issue(workers health), i believe this problem could be remedied by simpley making that a question on the application. "do you mind working around smokers?" then it wouldn't be anyones fault except there own.
I just want to address this idea. I've said my piece already on the general issue, and I won't belabour it.

But in re: having a question as part of an application process, I think it is a bad idea in the sense that it will not get the result that seems to be the overall goal (improvement in working conditions). Most people who work in bars and the restaurant industry don't have an amazing range of options when it comes down to it. What you'd end up with is a substantial proportion of people who actually do mind or think it is harmful to their health actually saying that they don't mind, so that they will be considered for the job. Saying that it will be their own fault is a bit harsh, since economic pressures force many people to do things they don't want to do (like work, period [img]smile.gif[/img] ).

The whole point in having a ban in certain areas where smoking arguably affects working conditions is to better the working conditions for people who do not have the power, economic or otherwise, to demand and enforce a change themselves. I think some governments are also cognizant of the health risks and stress on the health system down the road. That's certainly the case in my country, where the majority of medical procedures and care are subsidized by the government.
[/QUOTE]
slicer15 is offline