Quote:
Originally posted by Zuvio:
I guess it is in the hands of the professionals then, who have all the required data to come a conclusion.
Personally, if it proved to be like 30x faster then cable I would be all for it. Imagine: world-wide affordable T1-speeds! 
|
The problem is that none of the data is coming from a truly neutral party. Anyone who knows enough about radio to make an informed decision will be labelled an "Enthusiast" by the pro's. Anyone who isn't in radio technology will be labelled "Unknowledgable" by the cons. There's a lot of money involved here for relatively little investment. There could very well be a lot of dealing "under the table" to pass this. Contrary to popular belief, Hams are a burden to the FCC. No profit at all and lots of work. This means that there's little motivation for Ham interests except for "doing the right thing".
What's it with me and quotation marks today? [img]graemlins/1ponder.gif[/img]
[ 10-10-2003, 06:16 PM: Message edited by: Sir Kenyth ]