[Sir Taliesin]

Originally posted by IronDragon: quote: Timber Loftis said: You'll note Idaho's attorney general's office still intends to enforce its "crimes against nature" law which will prevent acts between gays or with animals. I've already pointed out the distinction with beastiality. As for the rest of it, I'm offering 3 to 1 odds that IF Idaho does enforce its law, it will be the "next item up for bids" on the State and Supreme Court hit list.

Were Idaho to enforce this law and charge two men with this ‘crime’ it would likely struck down by lower courts and would probably never even get near the Supreme Court. The justices already said in a 6-3 decision that what two consenting adults do in private is none of the states concern. [/QUOTE]You need to go back and re-read the quote from the Idaho AG. Well let me just paste it in that way you won't have to go look for it.

"Similarly, in Idaho, an 1864 state law that forbids "crimes against nature" will still be applied to public sexual acts involving gays, said Michael Henderson, deputy attorney general. He added that the law would also still apply to acts with animals."

He is talking about PUBLIC SEX ACTS, not those taking place in someones bedroom. I think that WILL stand up in court, since that statute can be and is applied to hetrosexuals as well. I regret that he single out gays in this statement, but you can be assured that a hetrosexual couple engaging in a sex act in public is going to see the inside of the hossgaw just like a gay couple would.

Never understood the attraction of having sex in a public place in the first place. It's definitely no a thing to do around children!!!