06-26-2003, 02:02 PM
|
#6
|
|
Guest
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Rokenn:
On the radio they were reading portions of Scalia's dissent and one of the first lines in it is that this will allow bestiality. Why is it that whenever gay rights advance the first thing the conservatives drag out is animal sex? Are they repressing something? [img]tongue.gif[/img]
|
While I realize you were being humorous, Id like to address the underlying principle...by allowing that there is an "Absolute right to privacy" any number of things, Including Beastiality, Incest and molestaion can occur under this legal "shield" They point out Beastiality first and foremost probably because like "most" people they find the thought disgusting and think that it will illustrate their point. Scalia is not a stupid man, and you should give him some credit for his common sense....there is at least one person on that bench that just reversed her previous opinions and ovtes...she caved in to social pressure from gay rights activists....You know...they aren't supposed to MAKE law up there....but this ruling comes pretty close if not actually doing it.
As always just my opinion, take it or leave it as you see fit [img]smile.gif[/img]
|
|
|
|