Maybe I misunderstand but isn't that sort of logical? If the gun was concealed and he didn't use it during the robbery, then it *wasn't* armed robbery was it? I mean, if you punch someone in the face and/or get into a fistfight while you are carrying a knife in your pocket (which you don't use during the fight, of course), you wouldn't get charged with "armed assault" or anything like that, correct? In that case I don't see why he should be charged with armed robbery, although I have no idea how anyone would intend to rob a bank unarmed... [img]graemlins/1ponder.gif[/img]
__________________
[img]\"hosted/melusine.jpg\" alt=\" - \" /><br />Your voice is ambrosia
|