View Single Post
Old 06-18-2003, 07:35 PM   #10
IronDragon
Elminster
 

Join Date: January 16, 2003
Location: Michigan
Age: 59
Posts: 419
Recognize I am not advocating a cost/benefit examination here but I would have to think that the anti-rejection medications he would have to take for the rest of his life would come to cost about the same as his current dialysis.

The slippery slope is if we say that this person is undeserving of a transplant because of his past are then not obligated to examining all potential transplant recipients and judging their past behavior? Who will decide if a potential recipient is moral enough to receive a transplanted organ?

I have a good friend who has received two transplanted organs (kidney and pancreas) and is now leading a normal life. Paul spent ten years as a heavy substance abuser and readily admits to leading a less than moral life for those ten years. Was he moral enough to be on the transplant list in the first place?
__________________
Ever notice that "What The Hell!" is always the right decision?- Marilyn Monroe
IronDragon is offline