[Davros]

Statistically speaking Cerek, a two to one ratio over a large sample size (say 200+ people) would "suggest" that the case for one side is more compelling than the other. A two to one ratio in a sample size of three is very simply "not statistically significant" and is NOT indicative that a compelling case exists for either argument. Efectively it came down to one man's opinion, and from previous reports of your court system, political appointments in the judiciary tend to flow along with favourable judgements for administrations.

If we were conducting a hypothesis test,the hypothesis of "The civil rights of the detainees have not been abused and due process has been followed" would fail the test.

Just thought it worth challenging you on this detail ole pal.