Quote:
Originally posted by Donut:
quote:
Originally posted by Ronn_Bman:
Ok Donut, now give me one that isn't 32 years old and didn't happen 6 presidents ago. [img]tongue.gif[/img] 
|
ONLY 32 years! I remember when it happened. I don't want to give another one Ronn. I believe this was a very rare occurence and that US forces rarely, if ever, commit war crimes. Which is why it is so curious that they want immunity. [/QUOTE]No one wants another, and no one is trying to arrange one, but the point is that it happened 32 years ago during the most F(%&ed up period in US military history, and a comparision to then and now isn't realistic.
Regarding the ICC, if the choice is not to participate, then securing immunity ensures that in
every sense. Basically, those who need our money and forces, have to agree to let us police them.
On a flippant note, is the fact that Lt. Calley wasn't sentanced to death the
good news or the bad news. [img]graemlins/hehe.gif[/img]