Here is a crash course in the difference :D

Chaotic Good
Chaotic Neutral
Chaotic Evil

Still don't get it?

Chaotic Neutral
Chaotic Evil

I figured it would be a lot easier then trying to explain it to my next gaming group :D

Robin Hood -- chaotic neutral? Robbing the rich to feed the poor? Sounds like a do-gooder to me...

BTW, how would you rate, say, the Addams Family?

You can't rate plain weirdness... :D I'm Chaotic Neutral...

Madness.. Robin Hood is the quintessential Chaotic Good character.

And I can rate plain weirdness just fine. In the case of the Addams family, I'd give them a solid Chaotic Neutral for being hedonistic and a touch mad, while living solidly outside of society.

True enough they live as to please themselves, but they don't force their indulgences on others, which if they did, would make them evil.

While Robbin Hood would appear Chaotic good at first glance, i dont think Chaotic Neutral is that far off is it? of course, by our romantic definition of 'good' robbing the rich and giving to the poor is great, but remember that not all the nobles he robbed were evil, so his act of robbing them was not good at all, and neutral at best.

I thought Sauron would be lawful evil. An unblinking (!) comitment to destroy good.

[img]graemlins/Funny_post.gif[/img] Truly... [img]tongue.gif[/img]

<font color=8fbc8f>Hmm, a do gooder that would steal at bow point? Never! Neutral at best.
Can we without doubt feel assured that all of those schillings made it to the poor? All of that drink, and the plates of food to keep Little John pleased? Me tinks someone has been altered.

A perfect settlement could not be better placed than with that caption, "Firing a bow into melee". Almost Perfect, just make it arrows of explosion!</font>

Ok how about the lawfuls?

Lawful Good
Lawful Neutral
Lawful Evil A little foul language