The question is simple .. Should we make Arms and Weapons.

We may say "they r important to safeguard us from our enimies" but then if there had been no ARMS what wld the enimies do?

I say no.

Yes to the arms, after all, lifting would be rather difficult without them, :D .

But seriously if someone has a dispute, be it nations or their leaders, I say let them beat the crap out of each other with their bare hands, if they can't solve it any other way. But what am I saying? Most politicians are pansies anyway.

As long as human beings want to kill each other there will be weapons.

Yeah, if there were no weapons in the beginning, then there certainly be some now ;)

I would ban projectiles and any weapons that make use of a chemical reaction to function.

The question may be reasonable as a debate of a utopian soceity - but it will never happen on this earth. Weapons and guns have to be acceptable, if you don't accept them then it makes no difference. I say yes. We have them, we will always have them, and we will always use them. Therefore they will always be in demand, and always be made - our countries might at least be at the forefront of arms technology.

How do you define weapon? Cutting this slice of bread I'm eating would be hard without a knife. Or is a knife not a weapon?

maybe ban axes, let everyone use chainsaws :rolleyes:

Mmmm...utopian society. Gurgle.

<font face="Verdana" size="3" color="#00FF00">ARMS and WoMD no, other weapons to an extent. I just wish the rich countries who build them would not sell them to retards for shooting there neighbors and there enemies to make a buck. </font> :D

[ 05-25-2005, 12:07 PM: Message edited by: pritchke ]