![]() |
Noticed there wasn't a thread for this yet - any motor sport fans here?
Much has been said about the fiasco that took place at Indianapolis Motor Speedway yesterday, most of it one group pointing the finger at another group. From what I can discern this is what happened:</font>
What they said (all taken from the Fox Sports Australia Motor Sport section): Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
I didn't see the race, but from what I've read I would agree with the FIA. The drivers had the choice of laying off the gas a little bit, changing tires more often, or accepting the penalty for using the new tires. I assume they knew about this penalty before they even asked about using the different tires. And the suggestion of requiring the Bridgestone cars to slow down as well is silly -- why should they be punished for bringing better equipment?
|
It's a disgrace. I have watched F1 for more than a decade and never in my life have I seen anything quite of this caliber. I thought the scandal of the season was made with BARs underweight car, but this takes the grand price.
I my opinion provisional permission should have been given to Michelins teams allowing them to race on their Magny-Cour tires. They were willing to race outside classification. Who would have cared? I just want to watch the race. It is especially disgraceful to the thousands and thousands of fans that come from all corners of the world to watch it. I simply cannot believe that an agreement could not be reached... I don't want to go around pointing fingers and blame specifical teams/orgs/individuals. All are to blame. None are blameless - not even the Bridgestone teams. |
A few years back the "good ol boys" had the same problem. Now they all run Goodyear's on their not so stock, stock cars!
My hats' off to the drivers that pitted. However, they should have opted to let FIA officals do a 300mph pass with those tires in question, and then see what position they would have been left with! |
Hmmm... I hadn't read about this, but it smells like tough rocks for the Michelin teams. They had a choice to go slower, to take the penalty, to change tires more often, or to skip the race. They made their choice, and they should live with it.
The idea of going into a race and asking the other guys to slow down because you can't go as fast is just ludicrous in my book. 'Course, the idea of going in with equipment that seems prone to failure for no apparent reason is just as ludicrous. Methinks they'll have a spare set of tires for future races, just in case... or they'll do more local testing. 'Tis truly a pity for those who went to see a race, though... they got far less than they wanted. *edit* See my retraction of this post further down. I stand educated (at least, more so). [ 06-22-2005, 11:56 AM: Message edited by: Bungleau ] |
Sorry Bungleau, but the choice was really limited to pit the cars - otherwise they would have raced. They clearly expressed that they did not care for placement.
1) Go slower. Slow cars on the track is a quite dangerous thing. Especially since they must go slower AND take a suboptimal lane in a hard turn crossing the ideal curve twice. 2) Take the penalty. The penalty is black flag. Better to remain in pit. If the penalty had been anything else they would have raced. There were still points to race for even if Ferrari had a 40 second lead from a first lap stop-and-go. Heck with Ferraris season so far I doubt they would have won. 3) Change tires more often. How often? Even with onboard pressure analyser it's a guessing game. *Turns head at Michelin*. Nope. No information on how many rounds the tires can stand. Leaving one: Remain in pit. And yes it is tough luck for Michelin teams and they didn't try to hide that fact. Otherwise they wouldn't have offered to race without classification. Of course they could have raced and purposely knocked the six Brigdestone cars off track. That would have been the smart choice. But that is not true sportsmanship. |
Quote:
|
Obviously the Bridgestone teams are least to blame. They did show up with superior equipment and should have the extra points or at the very least an advantage to match.
However especially one of the Bridgestone teams showed little regard to the fans and (as I understand it) sabotaged any attempt to reach an agreement. The other teams pledged solidarity and said they would pit along with the Michelin teams if it came to that. Then one of the teams broke that promise forcing the other one to follow suit since they are/were in direct competition over constructors and drivers ranking. So the only "crime" commited would be blatant disregard to the fans who put butter on their bread. Nothing more. I know I am being perhaps a little unreasonable here, but I care a great deal for this sport. I felt let down a little. Luckily I could just switch over to Le Mans highlights instead. Way to go Tom Kristensen! Six in a row. Seven in total. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Tne Michelin runners could have used new tyres but they would have breached 5 different F1 regulations. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:18 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2024 Ironworks Gaming & ©2024 The Great Escape Studios TM - All Rights Reserved