![]() |
I found this article here ---> http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/asiapc...ted/index.html
It has pictures of the alleged "terrorist". After I looked at them all I can think is "Way to go FBI!!", Feh. I wouldnt let thoes clowns look for my lost cat. Quote:
|
<font color="#ffccff">Are we surprised that perhaps terrorits would stoop to such dispicable acts as Identity theft? Why cant they stick to good old fashioned murder? </font>
|
Actually, those pictures and the information about the suspects was provided by the Canandian government.
|
Okay, so some schmo in Pakistan tried to use a UK passport illegaly to travel there and get a better job. That has ramifications, and I would hope he was appropriately punished for trying to better his situation through fraudulently pretending to be one of us "beautiful people" (a nod to Marilyn Manson).
But, that is a separate issue. Whether or not Canuckia supplied the photos, the FBI, once again, gets caught not doing its homework. Government attorneys and agents can get away with this shit. But, if I as a private attorney issued bigass subpoenas for the wrong guy, you better believe the judge would make me pay through the nose for it. C'mon guys, I expect a little professionalism from the FBI. Is that too much to ask? |
Quote:
[ 01-02-2003, 02:14 PM: Message edited by: MagiK ] |
Well said TL. It appears that someone who may/may not be a terrorist has acquired an identity an entered the US with it. It stands to reason that four other innocent men may be being targeted by the FBI.
Which brings up a question: What are those original five men up to now that the feds are looking for the wrong people? (assuming the other photos are frauds) |
What I am interested in is whether they are going to clear Mohammed Asghar's name.
|
Scholarcs, Mohammed Asghar's name was never smeared, Mustafa Khan Owasi is the name being given. And Timber, how do we know why Asgar tried to get into the UK? For all we know, he could have been trying to enter to activate a terror cell.
|
Khazadman, it does not matter. The point is the FBI got the wrong guy. Whether he tried to enter the UK to work illegally or activate a terrorist cell, he broke the law - it's just a matter of degree.
Plus, I'll note you are presuming guilt (on an issue he was not even accused of even) before knowing hardly *anything* about the man or the illegal immigration attempt that was at issue. Isn't innocence presumed? Or did I wake up in a different world this morning? Hope you never find yourself on the receiving end of such prejudgment. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:53 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2024 Ironworks Gaming & ©2024 The Great Escape Studios TM - All Rights Reserved