http://asia.news.yahoo.com/060530/3/2l954.html

[ 05-30-2006, 09:03 AM: Message edited by: ZFR ]

Ok the last sentence is really funny:

:rolleyes:

*checks calendar* Nope, it's not April 1.

The thought that a logical rational human being could propose such a thing... amazing.

Just for the record, they don't stand any chance whatsoever, we're not all stoned lunatic hippies downhere. Any pedophile who will go public with his stories here, will have a lynchingmob on his tail just as good as anywhere else in this world, and i'll personally find him a high enough tree to hang down from.

What a bunch of mental trainwrecks. I mean...sex ed for toddlers? That doesn't even make sense. None of it makes sense. I'm with johnny on this one.

Hey, I like stoned lunatic hippies!!

So long as they aren't pedophiles, of course.

Glad to hear it, johnny! Not that I even thought for a minute it would go anywhere seriously when I first heard about it, but still, nice to hear it from a native!

Behold the chairman of this new dark page in the Dutch book of history...

http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y29...domongeaul.gif

Now, i've been told that someone did a little bit of photoshopping with this piece of shit's teeth, but i'm not sure if that's true or not. To be honest, i hope this pic is genuine, it would suit him just right.

I'm all for freedom of speech and all that, but when people like this start openly sharing their desire to have sex with 12 year old girls, or whatever other freaky things that get them going, i'm starting to doubt democracy. There's obviously a few flaws that need to be fixed.

Well if people like that can illegally have sex with underage children, then I should be allowed to shoot/kill them ;)

In certain parts of the world it's aganst the law to have sex with persons under the age of twenty one.

In others the age of consent is thirteen.

There's a point where young people are able to make judgments about their personal lives, and what they want to do with them.

This varys from person to person, and I feel that aboloshing the age of consent is a very bad thing, it's law to protect thouse not mature enough to understand the implications of sexual acts, thouse not mature enough to know better, ect.

Now if a mainstream party had suggested a revision to the age of consent along the lines of 12+ if both partys age within two years, 16+ unlimited it would still meet resistance, but it's far more likely to pass into law.

Specificaly having a peadophile political party is just shooting yourself, and any rational talk about reducing the age of consent in the near future, in the foot.


If you look at sideways it's an ideal way to bring up the issue of increasing the age of consent, and having sterner laws regarding peadophilia