EU may consider ban on Nazi symbols
EUOBSERVER / BRUSSELS - Negotiations on EU legislation against racism and xenophobia are to be re-launched in the wake of the public outcry caused last week by Prince Harry's fancy dress outfit with its swastika armband. A Luxembourg EU Presidency source said that talks on a law combating racism and xenophobia, which have been stalled since early 2003, are to be revived. Discussions on the new law began in 2002 but have been on ice since early 2003 due to Italian objections. Luxembourg's decision to put this issue back on the political agenda follows calls by senior German politicians for a Europe-wide ban on the Nazi symbols. On Monday (17 January), the European Commission did not rule out the idea. A spokesperson for justice commissioner Franco Frattini said "it may be worth looking at the possibility of a Europe-wide ban, to explore that possibility at least". Freedom of speech However, such a ban would open up freedom of speech issues. "Banning symbols cannot ban evil and risks playing into the hands of those who would seek to subvert the very liberties we most champion", said Chris Davies, leader of the UK Liberal Democrat members of the European Parliament. It would also be very difficult for legislators to codify such a ban say EU officials. They would have to find wording that banned Nazi symbols but did not incriminate those who use them in a satirical manner to lampoon nazis. Similarly, it would have to be considered which Nazi symbols would be used and whether such a ban would cover symbols from other regimes - such as communism. The outrage caused by Prince Harry's outfit - it was a German soldier's uniform with a large swastika displayed on an armband - comes just ahead of the 60th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz, the nazi death camp. The anniversary, on 27 January, is to be attended by several world leaders including Russian President Putin, Israel's President Moshe Katzav, French President Jacques Chirac and Polish President Aleksander Kwasniewski. (EUObserver) |
If that means they can't show any nazi symbols on tv in movies or documentaries, or in historical books, then i'm against it, that just doesn't make any sense.
But if it prevents people to parade around in uniforms like that prick Harry did, i'm all for it. Those things belong in a museum, not on the streets or on parties. |
Quote:
And about the whole Harry's costume incident, personally I think it's silly. I remember my father telling me about how a few years ago in Estonia, two heads of different counties went to an important birthday party, one with a Nazi uniform and the other with a Soviet uniform. It didn't even reach the press. Oh well, I guess this shows a difference between Estonian and British mentality. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
As for banning the Swastka, It's a symbol that has been used in many cultures throughout history. For the Nazi part of it, if it is banned, will that force those that believe in the Nazi line to go under ground, or more under ground? I think they should be alowed to wear it so they are easier to spot, keep an eye on. If they are underground then they work on the very foundations of society, but if they are alowed to rise to the surface, they can be held up to reticule. An example is the KKK, at one time they could wear full hoods that covered their faces, so they remained anonymous, they held power. The people you dealt with everyday could have been a KKK member, and no one would have been the wiser. But once they were no longer alowed to hide their faces, then everybody in town knew who they were. Their power was gone, if something happened people knew who to look for, instead of the unknown anonymous visitor in the dark. |
Erm...ever since '45, nazi movements ARE underground. Whenever they want to arrange a meeting, it's done in secret. If they show themselves publicly, which occasionally happens, there will be riots.
|
Its not underground in the States I don't think? Do correct me if I'm wrong JD, but I've certainly seen Nazi meetings portrayed in films as being held out in the open with police having to keep violence from protesters down.
Edits: There seem to be several American Nazi parties advertised on the net. Here are a couple of links. Obviously don't click them if you'll be offended by Nazi propoganda. http://www.nsm88.com/articles/nazi.html http://www.americannaziparty.com/about/index.shtml Also a wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Nazi_Party I presume that makes them legal then... One of the Nazi sites is hosted by 1st-amendment.org (or something similar) so I would imagine that's their legal basis. Looking it up, a summary of the 1st amendment says: Quote:
Lots of edits [ 01-18-2005, 10:32 AM: Message edited by: shamrock_uk ] |
Quote:
By banning their symbols, they are alowed to feel they are being persecuted. Persecution weeds out the weak and make the strong, stronger. Let them out in the light and ignor them, nothing is more a powerful weapon to the human pshycie then to be ignored, marginalized(sp?). All of us want to be accepted, it's part of human nature. That's the way I'd skin that cat, but there are many ways to skin a cat. [ 01-18-2005, 10:26 AM: Message edited by: John D Harris ] |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:07 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2024 Ironworks Gaming & ©2024 The Great Escape Studios TM - All Rights Reserved