For my next run through, I was thinking a solo mage. Which do you think would be more challenging: a diviner or an enchanter?
The diviner misses out on conjuration (no familiar or summons, no planetar)
Enchanter misses out on invo/evo (no fireball, horrid wilting or mordenkaneins)

What do you think?

Enchanter would be MUCH harder, I think. After all, you'd get a LOT fewer actual damage spells, among other things...

------------------
Lord of the RaBid Fruit Trees. ChAos rules all! Bwahahahaha...
:1drgat1:

I think that starting as diviner would became really difficult but without any kind of summons you´ll get hard times

Initially, I thought a diviner would be tough, as you don't get any fodder, but actually you still get animate dead and mordenkaneins.

Now I reckon an enchanter would be harder, as you miss out on all the blasting power.

Thoughts?

[This message has been edited by Raag (edited 09-12-2001).]

Diviner is easier(less hard (I tried it myself once)). You can miss most conjuration spells, but when you can't cast evocation spells, well, you'll have a problem (on some of them). As a diviner, you will still have fodder, btw, you can still charm a lot of your enemies http://www.ironworksforum.com/ubb/no...les/tongue.gif But still, if I were you, I would take the necromancer http://www.ironworksforum.com/ubb/no...es/biggrin.gif

------------------
There's something in your eyes, ah no, I see now, it's the reflection of my deadly gaze - Mirac Honorguard
(Necromancer)

If you decide for diviner, take a look at invoker as well: no enchantment spells AND no summoning spells. Even worse than a Dynaheir or a Xan http://www.ironworksforum.com/ubb/no...iles/smile.gif

------------------
The last arrow of Legolas kindled in the air as it flew,
and plunged burning into the heart of a great wolf-chieftain.
All the others fled. -J.R.R. Tolkien, The Lord of the Rings
http://www.angelfire.com/realm/spijl/flashyelf.gif

Legolas, mourning for the USA