10 Level Rogue is enough IMO, after level 10 there's no need to improve my rogue anymore. my sneak attack will be 5d6. I'll have enough skills in all disarm/search skills. I want more attack bonus hp so I'll take the rest as fighter/ranger.

1 Ranger / 4 Fighter / 10 Rogue

10 level rogue is good option? or I better keep it pure?

Bad idea on the mix. It looks like you want the free "dual-weild," but you'll have a 20% XP penalty because of your strategy, which means one or two levels less advancement....

And, for leveling up as a fighter, that could be a feat or two, depending on where you're at. And you would also lose up to 20 HP.

Better to just go with the fighter/rogue, alternating levels and starting with Rogue (initial skill points are higher).

I'll keep one level difference between fighter and ranger class of course [img]smile.gif[/img]
my first idea was ranger1/fighter2/rogueX. I like to keep rogue on 10. the rest will be fighter/ranger. just for feats. and ranger for dw.

10 levels of rogue is enough right?