what is yalls opinon on which is better, an evil party or a good aligned partey?

Hmm. Both. For different reasons.

Also fun is having a Neutral PC who has both in his party. Keeping them all satisfied can be a whole new game.

well i mean which wuests would be better? my team is mostly neutral

Overall, you get the most XP through being good.

neutral - maintain the balence [img]tongue.gif[/img]

What balance? [img]tongue.gif[/img]

Bhall has balance? [img]tongue.gif[/img]

Yes.

Murder controls the population a bit, reducing starvation and wide spread disease due to over crowding.

Technically speaking, even bad things generally serve a greater purpose.

[spam] Evil will always triumph over good because good is dumb. [/spam]

Evil has the best Tank and arguably the best Wizard, but no Thief and only 3 characters total. Also, you can't buy items cheaply.

Good has the best Cleric, the other 2 contenders for best Wizard, and all 4 of the other contenders for best Tank, but also falls short in Thievery. Wins bonus points for Carsomyr potential.

Neutral has more Thievery than Good & Evil put together, the only Druidic spells, and a decent Cleric. But it has no Wizards and its Warriors are just barely enough Tanking material to protect the party.

Summary: Power-wise, you would be best with a mostly-Good party with 1 or 2 Neutral folks.