Lucern |
07-07-2005 04:38 AM |
Quote:
Originally posted by Cloudbringer:
PS: Lucern, an individual's experience is just as valid to that person as vague statistics without any backup. [img]smile.gif[/img] I think it is as valid to those experiencing it, at any rate! :D Besides, some researcher somewhere will just use our situations to prove the rule- exceptions and all that jazz! :D
|
Oh I agree Cloudy. My objection was on scientific grounds, and to be clear, I definately wasn't commenting on anyone posting personal experiences. What else would we do! I was objecting to the use of personal experience to dismiss research. It is tempting and natural to measure new information against what you know from your personal life, but from perspective of understanding humanity in a broader sense, it's misleading. Our experiences do matter, but in social science, groups of 1000's randomly picked experiences matter much much more [img]smile.gif[/img]
I read elsewhere that the claims of the researchers were wholly incongruous with this article's exploration. They say, and they have every right to based on the numbers they have, that they found a 'correlative' link between divorce and the gender of children. That simply means that the numbers show a relationship within the (unknown from this article) parameters. It doesn't reveal the nature of that relationship, just that there is one. They specifically say there are no grounds for a causal relationship between the two based on the data they have. What's the title of that article? "Do Daughters Cause Divorce?" Hmph. :D The causal relationship is not established. Perhaps more variables like number and ages of children, and average family income would reveal similar correlations that are more informative together. I really doubt the usefulness of any single variable in explaining causes of the termination of such complex relationships.
And it's uncommon to cite contradictory information to support your conclusions, contrary to the common phrase ;)
|