...because of it's sexual and violent content.

LINK

Beastialty, incest and violence. Bah, they could avoid such charges of indecency if only the publishers labled it fiction.

Bit slow off the mark today...

That was a bit under the belt...

Under the belt? It's downright offensive.

I'm thinking it's either borderline or right into the whole taboo on religious discussions, I do find that offensive, and would appreciate it if the images were removed please.

Yep... a bit off the mark, Johnny. It is what's being debated in Hong Kong, though... as Klorox' link at the start indicates, back when this thread was more focused.

It's a bunch of anti-christian crazies trying to stir up trouble, of course it's offensive... it was designed specifically for that purpose.

I like it!