![]() |
London riots
They ain't happy in Pomland that's for sure. Hope our London based members are ok.
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: London riots
Sounds like the cops are pulling out all the stops. Stay safe people!
|
Re: London riots
Thank god they got the chocolate and ice-cream.
|
Re: London riots
Biggest mover on Amazon.co.uk - baseball bats. This from a country that doesn't even play baseball!
http://www.pakpassion.net/ppforum/at...1&d=1312910703 |
Re: London riots
Quote:
What set the riots off? I thought I read something about the someone living in a low income housing project being killed by UK police. (Very vague I know) Or was that the 1985 incident? Edit: Nevermind the last bit. BBC news website FINALLY came back online. Mr Duggan, 29, whose death sparked the first riots in Tottenham, died from a single bullet wound, an inquest heard. Mr Duggan, a father of four, was shot in Ferry Lane, Tottenham, north London, on Thursday, as specialist firearms officers attempted to make an arrest. |
Re: London riots
Quote:
|
Re: London riots
Quote:
No evidence as yet that the gun was fired. No mention of a gang/drug link. Duggan's firearm was NOT a replica and was illegal. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-14459516 I'm going to wait for a few more facts to come in. |
Re: London riots
Lord Sugar needs to sort out this mess. 4th night in a row. From what I see they're just destructive youths looking for trouble and/or free stuff.
|
Re: London riots
Bah! I was bloody piss off because of england vs netherland's match was called off. I really wanted to see how tom cleverly will peform at senior international stage. I hope he will be call up by capello some other times.
Now this is funny.... http://i.imgur.com/mldiu.jpg |
Re: London riots
Those dirty blagards.
|
Re: London riots
Quote:
|
Re: London riots
People are starting to stick the boot into the Poms. Here's an opinion piece from Australia.
Quote:
|
Re: London riots
Quote:
|
Re: London riots
Quote:
|
Re: London riots
That is exactly where I was going, except John typed faster than I did.
If the United States continues on the path it currently is, we can see clearly where we will end up in 30 years by looking at Great Britain right now. If you see your neighbor making a horrible mistake and the consequences of that mistake, why on Earth would you want to make the same mistake? The Nanny State may, in its beginning, free people from their cell of poverty, but it also strengthens and makes the prison more secure--they are left with the illusion of freedom, not the actuality. |
Re: London riots
Quote:
At what point will we see them switch to gold instead of GBP? |
Re: London riots
Blaming the government for the actions of individuals. I find that viewpoint to be erroneous.
Hate to tell y'all but the "tea party" wing of the GOP has grown to be chocked-full of nanny statists and border-line theocrats. Many of those folks in the GOP simply jumped on the band-wagon getting the most press. |
Re: London riots
Quote:
The Tea Party has three problems at this time: 1) insufficient membership, 2) most of them are new so they have no political clout, and 3) no formal organization through which to further their goals. There are currently no theocrats in Washington, D.C. Tea Party folks do not support the Nanny State; quite the contrary, if given the ability to do so many of them would quickly and gladly dismantle the Nanny State in its entirety. Now....back to the riots in London. I don't live in England so I can't say for certain if these folks really have anything about which to riot. I can't think that life there is in such a poor state that only one action kicks off a riot. They aren't being oppressed overtly...they aren't told how to dress or what to eat...they aren't forced to listen to or read only government propaganda...there aren't people starving by the thousands while some form of aristocracy blithely ignores their suffering...etc. So why are people rioting? Because police shot a guy? If that were cause for a riot we would have them all the time here. |
Re: London riots
Omg if you want a good laugh look at the teaparty interviews on Youtube. Another issue is their obvious lack of education. Many have no idea what they're protesting. Worse, the ones who say they do sport signs that read things like "keep your government hands of my medicare", lol. I mean, granted if medicare is the issue for them chances are they are over 65 and get a pass for being doddering old people. Still, funny to watch.
|
Re: London riots
Quote:
Also, these are kids who loiter around the streets all day and night. In the UK curfews aren't enforced like in the US. If you're walking the streets at night with your mates cops won't stop you unless you're commiting a crime. In the USA you will be stopped if you look under 18 I think? And these people have no cause - they're just hooligans looking for free tv's and destruction. How do I know? Because i'm ashamed to say those are the people I used to hang with growing up. Out of their minds teenagers. |
Re: London riots
As opposed to someone who writes very true about an article about how it's government hand outs that have caused the problems.... yet all they can do is preach and side with the political party that wants to give out government handouts that they agree is causing the problems. But oppose at ever turn the political party that wants to LIMIT government handouts that are causing the problems.... Hmmm well, education and intellegence aren't the same thing and never will be.
ROTFLMAO, thanks for keeping me heathly |
Re: London riots
Quote:
|
Re: London riots
ROTFLMAO!!!!!Thanks you are really really really keeping me healthy.... Since you are doing your best to make fun of others and pointing out their... what was the term you used????? oh yeah lack of education... hmmm which part of LIMIT government handout means taking away welfare? Did you happen to learn that in school? Did you happen to learn that words have meanings? or did they go over that kind of stuff in the education you got?
|
Re: London riots
Omg we have to be quick 'cuz once you see those "ROTFLMAO"s that means the vortex is opening!!!!111#$%
But okay, so where does the article propose limiting benefits? |
Re: London riots
I didn't know you cared so much about my health. :P
|
Re: London riots
Quote:
|
Re: London riots
Quote:
|
Re: London riots
Quote:
Still waiting btw. |
Re: London riots
|
Re: London riots
Well said.
|
Re: London riots
Quote:
Yes, there are many city ordinances against teenagers being out late at night, especially while school is in session. This means they just congregate inside somewhere and get into trouble that way. It's a shame that those people have no better outlet for their frustration than to riot. Rioting citizens is a clear sign of severe problems in society. |
Re: London riots
Quote:
AFAIK, there was only one suit filed against NOPD officers for looting and that resulted in an acquital - that was in 2006 IIRC. Two other instances of police looting, including the alleged theft of cars from a Cadillac dealership, may still pending. I think the car theft case might have been squashed as the NOPD Police claimed the cars were used for patrols in the storm aftermath. There was a conviction (just recently) of 5 New Orleans police officers in the Danziger Bridge shooting which resulted in the shooting deaths of two men. I still follow some of the news from NOLA but not a lot, so it's possible I missed something on the NOPD looting cases. Wouldn't surprise me if there were cases that I missed. NOPD is one of the most corrupt police departments in the country. Always amazes me to listen to Ray "The Befuddled" Nagin when he gets on TV from time to time. |
Re: London riots
Well, we seen it in France, where riots started after two (criminal) teenagers that were being chased by the police had the brilliant idea to hide inside a powerunit and electrocuted themselves, and now it was England's turn, again after the death of someone that was definitely never gonna get an award for finding the cure for cancer, now i'm just waiting for our turn, which is only a matter of time.
|
Re: London riots
Quote:
|
Re: London riots
Quote:
|
Re: London riots
Quote:
I think riots can be a good thing. Doomed is a country that is too scared to fight back. And as we've seen on TV this year, they serve as a quick way to get the attention of your government. It's just here the UK these riots don't seem to be about anything, lol. Nobody is protesting a regime, or demanding freedom that they are denied. Like I said, it mostly consists now of an underclass of kids just who are bored. More stupid are the reporters who are taking them seriously. One reporter stopped a rioting teenager to ask him what the purpose of the whole thing was. The kid, seeing a camera and mic decided he better say something other than "The purpose is to steal stuff and fuc shit up". Instead, he said something like "We're tired of being pushed down by the government, tired of being told we are nothing". This kid was like 16. Wtf? I guess anything can sound noble when you make it about "Working for the man". I don't think kids get into the same kinda trouble congregating at their friends house with parents home than they do loitering on the streets en masse until 2am with no supervision. Even if they're @ friends house and the parents were absent, the most they can do is steal or mess up that house, as opposed to mugging people on the street or breaking into stores. They're still contained in one private property instead of being loose on the streets doing god knows what. Of course there are exceptions, different cities, laws, states make for good and bad outcomes, but generally I have found curfews play an excellent part in skipping lots of the bullshit in the evolution of kids. |
Re: London riots
Quote:
Meanwhile the real libertarian-leaning candidates like Ron Paul and Gary Johnson simply stick with the "R" besides their names. More towards the topic would be a discussion of the ineffectiveness of using anger to confront problems with solutions which require patience and caution. |
Re: London riots
Quote:
I have liked Ron Paul for quite some time. He is the one candidate the Republicans should have fronted for President--he stays in the party out of loyalty and he wants to change it from within--but the RNC has never taken him seriously...because he would make them change their ways. It is just a shame that he'll never win, a fact about which I am realistic. Anger never solves a problem, except in only the most short-sighted way and those usually cause more problems in the long run. Although there are times/places in which rioting is necessary...this is not one of those times. |
Re: London riots
Problem is the lines are blurred. Many see the tea-party as a direct offshoot of the Republican Party - and from observation they are the craziest, most extreme parts of the party. After all, their most famous speakers and leaders are all Republican.
|
Re: London riots
Quote:
After seeing them in action before Katrina, I expected them to be ignorant, arrogant, corrupt, and lazy. Nothing that happened during or immediately after Katrina changed my pov. yeah yeah I know broad brush generalization .... lol |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2022 Ironworks Gaming & ©2022 The Great Escape Studios TM - All Rights Reserved