Ironworks Gaming Forum

Ironworks Gaming Forum (http://www.ironworksforum.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Discussion (http://www.ironworksforum.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=36)
-   -   Maths Revision (http://www.ironworksforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=93696)

Callum 06-04-2005 01:29 AM

I'm trying to do some last-minute math revision, as I have a test on Monday, and I found a question I can't do. And the mark-scheme doesn't make sense.

The question:

f:x |-> 3^x

Find the solution of the equation f''(x) = 2

My first step was to find the inverse of f(x)... f'(x)

So I let k = 3^x
ln(k) = ln(3^x)
ln(k) = x(ln(3))
x = (ln(k))/(ln3)
(x = log(base 3)(k))

But then I tried finding the inverse of the inverse... f''(x)and got the original function.

The answer scheme, however, says that f'(x) is not what I got at all, but is actually (3^x)(ln(3)).

What am I doing wrong?

Seraph 06-04-2005 01:51 AM

Well I'm not actually sure what you mean by inverse, what are trying to do with it, or why it would help you get f'(x). You are however correct that x = log(base 3)(k), but I would say that should be obvious from the initial problem, as it is basically the definition of a logarithm.

Here is how I would figure out f'(x) and f''(x):
f(x) = 3^x
f(x) = e^(x * ln(3))
f'(x) = d(e^(x * ln(3)))/dx
f'(x) = e^(x * ln(3)) * ln(3)
f'(x) = 3^x * ln(3)
f''(x) = d(3^x * ln(3))/dx
f''(x) = d(e^(x * ln(3)) * ln(3))/dx
f''(x) = ln(3) * d(e^(x * ln(3)))/dx
f''(x) = ln(3) * ln(3) * 3^x

[ 06-04-2005, 01:58 AM: Message edited by: Seraph ]

Callum 06-04-2005 02:03 AM

Dammit! That's where the problem lies! I knew I was forgetting something... f'(x) doesn't mean the inverse of x, it means the derivative of it!

D'oh!

Thanks! :D

[ 06-04-2005, 02:04 AM: Message edited by: Callum ]

Aragorn1 06-04-2005 04:12 AM

and f''(x) is the second derivative

f-1(x) is the inverse i think.

Callum 06-04-2005 06:25 AM

Yeah... bodes well for monday's exam no? :D

Aragorn1 06-04-2005 08:18 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Seraph:
Well I'm not actually sure what you mean by inverse
the inverse is 1/f(x) and onviously, doing 2 inverses would be 1/1/f(x) which =f(x), hence it got Callum nowhere [img]smile.gif[/img]

[ 06-04-2005, 08:21 AM: Message edited by: Aragorn1 ]

Kynaeus 06-05-2005 12:12 AM

Please tell me this is not Grade 10 math!! :'(

my math exam has been very easy so far, 25 minutes for 15 multiple choice questions [img]smile.gif[/img]

Aragorn1 06-05-2005 05:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kynaeus:
Please tell me this is not Grade 10 math!! :'(

my math exam has been very easy so far, 25 minutes for 15 multiple choice questions [img]smile.gif[/img]

I'm in the 'year 13' although we wouldn't call it that. I'm at college, so i'm a second year. I think it used to be called 'upper-sixth,' but only the oublic schools call it that now i think.

Callum 06-05-2005 06:19 AM

Maths multiple choice!?

*blinks*

Wow.. Sounds... difficult.

And I'm in the year below Aragorn1... though we do call it year 12/13 here.

Aragorn1 06-05-2005 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Callum:
Maths multiple choice!?

*blinks*

Wow.. Sounds... difficult.

And I'm in the year below Aragorn1... though we do call it year 12/13 here.

Does your school go from yr 7-13?

Gangrell 06-05-2005 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Seraph:
Here is how I would figure out f'(x) and f''(x):
f(x) = 3^x
f(x) = e^(x * ln(3))
f'(x) = d(e^(x * ln(3)))/dx
f'(x) = e^(x * ln(3)) * ln(3)
f'(x) = 3^x * ln(3)
f''(x) = d(3^x * ln(3))/dx
f''(x) = d(e^(x * ln(3)) * ln(3))/dx
f''(x) = ln(3) * d(e^(x * ln(3)))/dx
f''(x) = ln(3) * ln(3) * 3^x

...

o.o

...

*brain explodes* I envy people that understand that crap [img]tongue.gif[/img]

Aragorn1 06-05-2005 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Gangrell:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Seraph:
Here is how I would figure out f'(x) and f''(x):
f(x) = 3^x
f(x) = e^(x * ln(3))
f'(x) = d(e^(x * ln(3)))/dx
f'(x) = e^(x * ln(3)) * ln(3)
f'(x) = 3^x * ln(3)
f''(x) = d(3^x * ln(3))/dx
f''(x) = d(e^(x * ln(3)) * ln(3))/dx
f''(x) = ln(3) * d(e^(x * ln(3)))/dx
f''(x) = ln(3) * ln(3) * 3^x

...

o.o

...

*brain explodes* I envy people that understand that crap [img]tongue.gif[/img]
</font>[/QUOTE]No you don't.

And these days that's the 'easy' stuff for me! :D
Double angle formulae, trigometric integration AHHHH!

JrKASperov 06-05-2005 05:27 PM

Oh man, I do math at university level, and someone mistook the inverse for the derivative! :D :D :D :D

No offense, there are people who don't know what the '2' above the x means. ;)

Seraph 06-05-2005 09:05 PM

I don't know if anyone is interested, but my girlfriend was able to come up with a totally different way to get f'(x).

f(x) = 3^x
ln(f(x)) = ln(3^x)
ln(f(x)) = x*ln(3)
d(ln(f(x)))/dx = d(x*ln(3))/dx
d(ln(f(x))/df(x) * d(f(x))/dx = d(x*ln(3))/dx
1/f(x) * f'(x) = ln(3)
f'(x) = f(x) * ln(3)
f'(x) = 3^x * ln(3)
You should then be able to apply the same procedue to get f''(x).

Sir Goulum 06-05-2005 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Gangrell:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Seraph:
Here is how I would figure out f'(x) and f''(x):
f(x) = 3^x
f(x) = e^(x * ln(3))
f'(x) = d(e^(x * ln(3)))/dx
f'(x) = e^(x * ln(3)) * ln(3)
f'(x) = 3^x * ln(3)
f''(x) = d(3^x * ln(3))/dx
f''(x) = d(e^(x * ln(3)) * ln(3))/dx
f''(x) = ln(3) * d(e^(x * ln(3)))/dx
f''(x) = ln(3) * ln(3) * 3^x

...

o.o

...

*brain explodes* I envy people that understand that crap [img]tongue.gif[/img]
</font>[/QUOTE]I'm with you, but I don't envy them. Anything with x's are too much for my brain to handle. [img]tongue.gif[/img]

Azred 06-06-2005 12:01 AM

<font color = lightgreen>Seraph, your girlfriend got the right answer and differentiated the function correctly.

Then function is question is an exponential function; in its generic form looks like this: f(x) = k ^ x, with k being a non-negative numbers (usually). The first derivative takes the form f'(x) = (ln k) * (k ^ x). Multiple derivatives have this form: (f(n))(x) = ((ln k)^n) * (k ^ x).

If it helps, you could always think of letting k = e, because finding derivatvies for e^x is really easy. [img]graemlins/beigesmilewinkgrin.gif[/img]

Interestingly, if you let k = sqrt(2), begin with an x-value of 1, and iterate the function (the x-value of the next step is the f(x)-value from the last step) then the iterated function values converge to sqrt(2). [img]graemlins/petard.gif[/img] </font>

Aragorn1 06-06-2005 03:19 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by JrKASperov:
No offense, there are people who don't know what the '2' above the x means. ;)
2*x isn't it? :D :D :D

Callum 06-06-2005 07:36 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Aragorn1:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Callum:
Maths multiple choice!?

*blinks*

Wow.. Sounds... difficult.

And I'm in the year below Aragorn1... though we do call it year 12/13 here.

Does your school go from yr 7-13? </font>[/QUOTE]Yes. :D

Quote:

Originally posted by Aragorn1:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Gangrell:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Seraph:
Here is how I would figure out f'(x) and f''(x):
f(x) = 3^x
f(x) = e^(x * ln(3))
f'(x) = d(e^(x * ln(3)))/dx
f'(x) = e^(x * ln(3)) * ln(3)
f'(x) = 3^x * ln(3)
f''(x) = d(3^x * ln(3))/dx
f''(x) = d(e^(x * ln(3)) * ln(3))/dx
f''(x) = ln(3) * d(e^(x * ln(3)))/dx
f''(x) = ln(3) * ln(3) * 3^x

...

o.o

...

*brain explodes* I envy people that understand that crap [img]tongue.gif[/img]
</font>[/QUOTE]No you don't.

And these days that's the 'easy' stuff for me! :D
Double angle formulae, trigometric integration AHHHH!
</font>[/QUOTE]Pfft... I know double angle formula.

And that should be easy stuff for me too... and is, now that I revised. My math exam went well... except for a right cow of a last question, involving 3d calculus and vectors and god knows what else. He said we wouldn't be having anything on planes and lines in 3d space... then gave it us anyway. [img]tongue.gif[/img]

Quote:

Originally posted by Azred:
<font color = lightgreen>Seraph, your girlfriend got the right answer and differentiated the function correctly.

Then function is question is an exponential function; in its generic form looks like this: f(x) = k ^ x, with k being a non-negative numbers (usually). The first derivative takes the form f'(x) = (ln k) * (k ^ x). Multiple derivatives have this form: (f(n))(x) = ((ln k)^n) * (k ^ x).

Yep... I know that know... yay for my extra three hours of revision! :D

Aragorn1 06-06-2005 08:46 AM

What exam was it? Internal, external?

Callum 06-06-2005 09:36 AM

Internal... but my predicted grades will kinda hinge on this. [img]tongue.gif[/img]

Aragorn1 06-06-2005 09:56 AM

Wow, that's a bit tough! In my case it was 'meh, you'll probably get an A'. God knows what ot would have been if they went on my maths test scores. Good for uni applications! THen again, i've done the ASs, so that would give them a better indication.

Gangrell 06-06-2005 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Azred:
<font color = lightgreen>Seraph, your girlfriend got the right answer and differentiated the function correctly.

Then function is question is an exponential function; in its generic form looks like this: f(x) = k ^ x, with k being a non-negative numbers (usually). The first derivative takes the form f'(x) = (ln k) * (k ^ x). Multiple derivatives have this form: (f(n))(x) = ((ln k)^n) * (k ^ x).

If it helps, you could always think of letting k = e, because finding derivatvies for e^x is really easy. [img]graemlins/beigesmilewinkgrin.gif[/img]

Interestingly, if you let k = sqrt(2), begin with an x-value of 1, and iterate the function (the x-value of the next step is the f(x)-value from the last step) then the iterated function values converge to sqrt(2). [img]graemlins/petard.gif[/img] </font>

I hate you all now [img]tongue.gif[/img] :D


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2024 Ironworks Gaming & ©2024 The Great Escape Studios TM - All Rights Reserved