I honestly do not know much about computers, and I am wondering about the difference between Celeron and Pentium 4 processors. I am looking at possibly getting a new computer, and I am looking over the sales that they have tomorrow (ah, the fun of day after Thanksgiving shopping! :D ). I notice that they are all in the 2.5+ GHz range, so cannot see any difference there. But what is the real difference between the two?

I was looking at the Best Buy flyer in today's paper, and they have a Intel Celeron 2.6 GHz w/ 80 Gig hard drive and CD-RW/DVD combo drive for $449.99 with $250.00 mail-in rebate for a total of $199.99 after rebate (Friday until noon only). Considering that I am running on a 933 MHz Pentium 3, this is rather attractive. But if Celeron is garbage, then I'll pass on it.

As a side question, how are Maxtor hard drives? They have a 120 GB hard drive for $139.99 with $90.00 in rebates (total $49.99 after rebates), but it is a Maxtor. I have an 80 GB Seagate, and can swear by Seagate (recommended by a friend, and have not been disappointed), so would not change unless I can count on the Maxtor to hold up like the Seagate. If I buy the Celeron listed above, I will switch out the hard drive that comes with it for the Seagate (I'm slowly getting together the components for a secondary system as I replace stuff, so the extra 80 GB hard drive would go in there).

Please enlighten a relative neophyte about these questions, as I do not want to end up in line at 4:00 AM to get into Best Buy just to be disappointed.

Celerons are budget processors - the difference between a Celeron and the equivalent Pentium used to be that the Celly had 25% of the cache - it could store less in the ultra-fast cache memory, and had to use slower system RAM more often, killing performance on many kinds of operation. I'm not sure what the difference between the current celly and the P4 is, but the celly will be crippled in gaming performance. Still a decent chip, but you will not see incredibly performance from it. www.tomshardware.com probably have a comparison that will tell you just how bad it is. My supper is burning as I type, so Ill look it out later.

I was right, the differernce is in the cache, and it can hit your performance by about 20% on some games. Other difference is that its builton the 'willamette' core, which runs a lot hotter than the current P4 'northwood; core. ALso, it dosent overclock very well, you wont be able to get much more than the rated speed out of it no matter what you do in terms of cooling.

Hmmm...but a 20% performance hit as compared to a 933 MHz Pentium 3? I'm planning on moving the 640 MB of memory over to the new computer, as well, so that may help somewhat with it "dipping into" the RAM. And I have never overclocked (really don't know what that is). I do have an extra fan installed over and above what I need for my system; I could move that over to handle the extra heat.

However, what you are stating is definitely something to consider. WalMart is having a sale on a similar system, but a Pentium 4 2.5 GHz for $798.00 (however, this also includes a 15" flat panel monitor; no option listed to get it without the monitor). If the Celeron is really that bad, then it might be worth paying more (I'll have to check the finances to see if I can afford it) and getting the P4.

Damnit. I distinctly remember editing that post to remove the innaccuracies caused by not reading the newer article.

Newer versions run on the same core as the P4 - overclock like a dream and much more reasonable heat, but the cache still holds them back. (Overclocking is running the chip faster than spec. A good way to fry things if you arent careful, and you dont tend to get as much extra power as you would think. Still, its what Cellys are traditioanaly good at)

It will outperform your P3, and it will run current games if you give it a nice video card to play with. Beyond that, don't get your hopes up for it.

Oh, ok! That sounds better than the first post. Here are the product specifications:

Product Details
Warranty Terms - Parts 1-year limited
Warranty Terms - Labour 1-year limited
Product Height 14.25"
Product Width 7.25"
Product Weight 22.5 lbs.
Product Length 16"
USB Ports 6 USB 2.0 (2 front, 4 back)
Video Memory 64MB shared
Manuals Included User's guide, Microsoft Windows XP manual
Maximum CD-ROM Drive Speed 40x
Maximum DVD-ROM Drive Speed 16x
Keyboard Description Premium multimedia keyboard
Modem 56 Kbps* ITU V.92-ready PCI internal fax/modem *Capable of receiving 56 Kbps downloads. However, current regulations limit download speed to 53 Kbps.
MPEG Yes
Network Card Built-in 10/100 Ethernet
Operating System Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition
Other Control Devices (mouse, etc.) 2-button wheel mouse
Parallel Ports 1
Processor Brand Intel® Celeron® processor
Processor Speed 2.6GHz
Removable Storage None
Serial Ports 1
Speakers Yes
Software Included Microsoft Works 6.0, Microsoft Money 2003, Encarta Online, Adobe Acrobat Reader, Power DVD, Microsoft Media Player, Real Player, Norton AntiVirus
System Bus 400MHz
System Memory (RAM) 256MB
System Memory (RAM) Expandable To 1.0GB
Total Expansion Bays 3 (3.5"), 2 (5.25")
Total Expansion Slots 3 PCI
Type of Memory (RAM) PC2100 DDR
Available Expansion Bays 1 (3.5"), 1 (5.25")
Available Expansion Slots 2 PCI
Audio AC '97 audio
Cache Memory 128KB L2 cache
CD-ROM Drive Shared
CD-RW Drive Shared
CD-RW Drive Speeds 48x16x40
Diskette Drive Yes
Diskette Drive Type 3.5" 1.44MB
DVD-RW Drive No
DVD-RW Drive Speeds No DVD-RW drive
DVD-ROM Drive Shared
DVD-ROM/CD-RW Combo Drive Yes
DVD-ROM/CD-RW Combo Drive Speeds 16x DVD-ROM; 48x16x40 CD-RW
Game Ports 0
Graphics Intel® Extreme Graphics 3D
Hard Drive Type Ultra DMA EIDE
Hard Drive Size 80.0GB
IEEE 1394 Ports 0

I have a DVD burner, so I'd almost certainly put that in instead of the CD-burner/DVD player combo drive. I'd also put in the 56x CD player that I have. Of course, haven't heard anything about the Maxtor yet, so not sure about the hard drive (if I chose not to get it, I'd end up moving the Seagate over to the new system). I have 640 MB memory on my current system (not sure if compatable with the memory of this system, but I know how to move that over). My graphics card is 32 MB in the old system, so it would be better to leave the one in the newer system alone.

Overclocking does not sound like a good thing to do, especially if you have a good chance of frying your computer. I guess it delays having to buy a new board every six months when it gets obsolete. ;)

Does the above sound like a good system for $450.00 (well, $200.00, but I have to wait on the $250.00 rebate)?

I'm by no means an expert but that deal looks a ripper. Ok the celron is not the best but it is better, a lot better, than what you have. It comes with windows xp and all plus a warranty. Go for it ;)

The only drawback with the celron in real life is with gameing. what are the latest games you have? and what games are you planning to buy? check out the requirments before buying.

Good luck

Price sounds ok, but there are 2 performance hits that I see. You have an integrated video board on the computer (it shares main memory, thereby running at a slower speed.) The other problem with the memory is that you only have 256 Mb. When you run Xp, you want to have AS MUCH memory as you can. 512 is preferred when gaming. The system you are looking at will get you by, but its performance during gaming might get a little aggravating.

[ 11-28-2003, 05:03 AM: Message edited by: Tobbin ]

No AGP slot. No AGP Slot!. You wont be able to add in a seperate video card later, unless you go for a PCI card which limits your options.

So lets look at the quality of this "Extreme Graphics 3D" thing. And after a brief search on toms, I have to say it gives possibly the worst set of results I have seen in recent years. Really, its terrible. Half the tests it can't even run fast enough to return a result. And its only DX7 compatable.

http://www6.tomshardware.com/graphic...903/index.html

Here's my opinion as a Celeron user. I think people are exegerating when they describe the Celerons to you.

My computer is a 333mhz Celeron. It has 384 Megs of PC 100 SDRAM and a 128 Megs video card. I install all my games on a 5400 turn Hard Drive and I never defrag, it take too long.

Well... I can play Warcraft 3 plus expension with all setting to the max with no lag. I can play Arx Fatalis, Morrowind, Neverwinter Night +SoU and recently I installed URU and it run fine, with only a little lag once in a while.

If I can do that with a 333MHZ celeron running on a slow never deragmented Hard Drive, you'll have no problem playing any games on a High Tech Celeron.

But as Andrewas said, No AGP slot is bad, unless you have lots of PCI slots.

Go for a Pentium if you can afford it, but otherwise, a Celeron will do a good job.

I went ahead and bought it, but I do agree about the AGP slot (however, considering that I am running on a 16 MB video card currently, I think I will still notice an improvement). It only cost $15.00 to upgrade to 512 MB memory, so I did so. So once I get the money back from the rebate, it will only set me back $214.99.

However, though I do like some gaming, I do not do too much heavy gaming. The most system intensive game that I own is Temple of Elemental Evil; the movies are a little choppy (they suck anyway), but otherwise it runs alright. I use my computer quite a bit for school (and some work). Lots of Office XP usage, etc. along with quite a bit of internet. I still mostly play BG2 as my main game, so as long as that is not choppy I should be fine. But this is primarily a school machine with some multimedia (playing movies and music, mostly).

well congrats! you bought it [img]smile.gif[/img]

given what you said it's a fine choice... but remember, you still have to think about the future... you would want to make your PC as flexible as it can be... so it can quickly adapt to your needs ;)

That's cool that you picked it up. Sorry if what I said made it sound like you couldn't run it at all or anything. The performance hits you are talking about were mainly what I had meant. I'm glad you opted up for the 512 Mb's of memory though. That'll help smooth some stuff out (especially since your video shares the same memory.) I have a Celeron laptop and it runs pretty decent. I used to have an off-brand for a desktop too, but about a year ago, I upgraded to a Pentium IV. It runs a lot smoother now. Still, I was able to get by with the Celeron in the interim. Congratulations on upgrading regardless of the rest. You can try out some stuff that you couldn't run before, so that's all that really matters. That, and it will come in handy for school. [img]smile.gif[/img] Congrats

Thanks for all of your responses. I haven't hooked it up yet (typing right now on the old system), but I am planning to do so either today or tomorrow (really busy day today, so might not get a chance until tomorrow).

Actually, I do have another question. What is the real difference between AMD and Pentium? Just curious, as I have stuck with Pentiums pretty much the whole way.

[ 11-29-2003, 11:44 AM: Message edited by: Nerull ]

With AMD you mean Athlons? As far as I know, they are better for gaming and run a little faster than Pentiums. For example, the recommended specs for Max Payne 2 is either a 1.7GHz Pentium or a 1.4GHz Athlon, so they do run faster. Any deeper than that I have no idea, so I guess you'll have to wait till more techies are on. Sorry!