![]() |
<font color="#66cc99">Being the anal, skeptical, contentious bastard that I am. I have long believed all this rambeling about the radiation hazards of cell phones and microwave ovens and CRT's was a bunch of BS but didn't have any thing to prove or disprove the popular news stories. So I was quite interested when I heard the following.
From the Dr. Dean Edell Radio Talk Show on WMAL in Washington DC. THe doc reported that a study that just wrapped up, that was conducted on the survivors of the Nagasaki and Hiroshima atomic bomb attacks. The study was to track these survivors to see what kinds of health effects the radiation that these people received from the bombs had ontheir long term health. The amount of radiation these people received is reported to be 10,000 times that received from a normal medical X-ray which in turn is much higher than the radiation received from cell phones, crt's and microwave ovens. The test concluded that those people who were exposed to the bombs radiation did indeed exhibit a higher instance of tumors than people who did not suffer the radiation dose. While this is not surpriseing, what I did find surprising is that the total number of tumors encountered was 468. That is 468 out of 80,000 people tracked. Of the 468 the vast majority of the tumors were benign types of tumors and easily removed with no ill effects (they did not say what percentage). So what Im taking away from this is that, 80,000 people who got zapped with 10,000 times the radiation deemed safe for a single exposure 468 of them had problems with tumors. I think our cell phones and microwaves may be safer than the news papers want us to believe. Of course they didnt bother mentioning the other 80,000 people who got flash fried and died instantly nor what their odds of tumors would have been had they lived.</font> |
Just on the same line of thought with another recent study:
Quote:
|
Gee Scholarcs, it couldnt be because of all the oil fires Iraqi forces started at the end of the gulf war could it?And the fact that its Iraq putting out the statistics?
Depleted uranium rounds have been around a long time. They are practiced with all the time. If it was as harmful as you say our entire military would be one big cancer ward. Along with all the civilian areas surrounding the bases. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
AND!!!! the presence of depleted uranium ceramic aerosols can pose a long term threat to human health and the environment. [ 10-20-2002, 12:46 PM: Message edited by: Eisenschwarz ] |
Quote:
Edit: Just for the sake of accuracy here. Missiles are not made of depleted uranium. From what I learned in my "Principles of Guided Missiles and Nuclear weapons" course from the US Navy, the only rounds to use depleted uranium are anti-tank rounds fired by tanks and I believe the A10 Thunderbolt II. The anti-tank missiles use shaped charges known as HEAT rounds and some times tungsten penetrator rods, but as far ans the public inventory goes there are no depleted uranium missiles.</font> [ 10-20-2002, 01:46 PM: Message edited by: MagiK ] |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The LOSAT uses KEM missiles IIRC, But I dunno what the penetrator is. |
Quote:
<font color="#66cc99"> I understand that but: A. Depleted Uranium isn't causing tank crews to drop dead from the radiation,(because it is not that radioactive) B. Almost all of the DU rounds were fired in unoccupied desert and most importantly of all. C. The Iraqi population centers are NORTH of where these aerosols were supposedly generated..the prevailing winds are west to east. SOOOOOO the people who should be dropping in droves would have to be in Khuzestan Iran and maybe in Basra and northern Kuwait, and not in Baghdad or any other Iraqi population center.</font> Quote:
<font color="#66cc99"> What part of Iraq? Look at the maps and check the prevailing winds, only Bassra could have been affected. There are no other "Population" centers down there. Kuwait and Iran would have been the ones that should be reporting problems not Iraqi's</font> Quote:
The LOSAT uses KEM missiles IIRC, But I dunno what the penetrator is. <font color="#66cc99"> Well yes the some armor has some DU in it, but I don't think we were tossing tank hulls around to bombard troops or cities. Nearly all penetrators that aren't of a ceramic nature are tungsten. I have never read about any other material. LOSAT specs show that the penetrator is a "High Density Rod Armour Penetrator" which previously has been used to describe a long tapered tungsten rod.</font>[/QB]</font>[/QUOTE] |
We actually had a problem with spent depleted uranium shells in the ocean. We cleaned them up, but there were still problems with the wildlife. The thing was, they'd been down there for like 10 years. So in other words, constant close exposure probably does create problems, but other than that, the effects are fairly minimal.
|
Quote:
And would be expected to crop up down wind, in Kuwait, and Iran not in northern Iraq. I'm wondering how much of an impact the checmical and biological agents SH released on the Kurds in the middle and north of the country has had on the health of Iraqi citizens. Think those might have some negative effects? But again, you would expect the problems to crop up down wind which is Iran...one of the reasons Im betting, that SH didn't hesitate using chemical weapons against the Iranians in that war.</font> [ 10-20-2002, 03:34 PM: Message edited by: MagiK ] |
LOL, MagiK causing trouble again. Sorry, I am fairly unconcerned of the effect of DU rounds on the inhabitants of enemy tanks. :D
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Did you see The Killer Shrews? They had collie dogs painted and with fake teeth. In one scene, I swear that one of the "Shrews" was licking the actors instead of biting them. |
LOL Attalus I missed the shrews! I'll look for it on TNT or TBS ;) I remember the bunnies/Lepus gnawing on the silly humans! It was corny as hell LOL
|
<font color="#66cc99">
You nut jobs! The DU rounds are SUPPOSED to kill the inhabitants of tanks!...errr Enemy tanks...Im pretty sure the inhabitants of the tanks firing the DU rounds might get a bit miffed if they were to start dropping dead from handeling the silly things. Hey LoA do they make you wear lead undies when you have to use those rounds? [img]smile.gif[/img] </font> |
<font color="#66cc99">
Boy you guys watch some of the worst movies....wonder what it says about me that I do too [img]smile.gif[/img] </font> |
Quote:
|
Yes, LoA, I saw The Killer Leeches and appreciate its ... artistry ;)
One of the recent hot arguments around our house was about whether Freddie Got Fingered had replaced Ed Wood's Plan Nine From Outer Space as the worst movie of all times. The consensus was that it had, because we laughed a lot more watching Plan Nine than that other bit of ... weirdness. The scene where the cop trips over the gravestone and it goes sproing-g-g has me rolling on the floor every time, and Piestrider, too. |
Quote:
“The purpose of this work was to determine the concentration and ratio of uranium isotopes in allied forces Gulf War veterans. The 27 patients had their 24-hour urine samples analysed for 234U, 235U, 236U, and 238U by mass spectrometry. The urine samples were evaporated and separated into isotopic dilution and concentration fraction by the chromatographic technique. The isotopic composition was measured by a thermal ionisation mass spectrometer using a secondary electron multiplier detector and ion-counting system. The uranium blank control and SRM960 U isotopic standard were analysed by the same procedure. Statistical analysis was done by an unpaired t test. The results confirm the presence of depleted uranium (DU) in 14 of 27 samples...” I won’t pretend to understand much of that, But what this study seems to be saying is that 14 out of 27 allied forces gulf war veterans (in the study) were found to have DU in their bodies. This means that More people who were involved in the fighting might have it in them. And Having DU in your body is bad :o( A report on DU by the U.S. Army Environmental Policy Institute says that "if DU enters the body, it has the potential to generate significant medical consequences. The risks associated with DU in the body are both chemical and radiological..." Quote:
Additional soldiers could have been exposed because they entered, crawled on, sat on, touched or kicked up dust by walking around Iraqi tanks and other vehicles destroyed by depleted uranium metal penetrates used in cannon rounds. It's interesting to note that A sub-commission of the United Nations Commission on Human Rights appointed a 'rapporteur' to investigate the use of depleted uranium weapons among other types of weapons, after passing a resolution which categorised depleted uranium weapons alongside such as nuclear, chemical and biological weapons, napalm, and cluster bombs as a 'weapon of indiscriminate effect'. Quote:
Quote:
"Another report showed that the prevailing winds during the days of tank battles in southern Iraq blew southeast, "meaning that the fumes from depleted uranium went back to the American forces in Kuwait," said Suad Naji al-Azawi, a University of Baghdad ecologist who was educated at Colorado College in Colorado Springs." So rather than the Iraqi people, It seems teh USA forces got it instead! Quote:
IIRC Armour is becomeing Too hard to penetrate now, So the main points of attack are now Tracks & the Turret Ring. so Maybe They can get rid of that nasty DU and use other Fun Heavy Metals. HTH! HAND! |
Hey Magic, doesn't the Phalanx(sp) System fire DU rounds?
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:01 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2024 Ironworks Gaming & ©2024 The Great Escape Studios TM - All Rights Reserved