Ironworks Gaming Forum

Ironworks Gaming Forum (http://www.ironworksforum.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Discussion (http://www.ironworksforum.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=36)
-   -   Iraq stuffs up another hanging (http://www.ironworksforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=79033)

Memnoch 01-15-2007 07:41 PM

This time it's Saddam's brother or cousin or someone. Apparently his head was ripped off by the force of the noose.

Quote:

CAIRO (Reuters) - The botched hanging of Saddam Hussein's half-brother Barzan on Monday aroused Arab suspicions of foul play and malice, deepening the divide between the Iraqi government and Arabs in other countries.
.
The noose pulled off Barzan al-Tikriti's head as he fell from the gallows, suggesting that the hangman had misjudged the length of rope needed just to break his neck.
.
Government spokesman Ali Dabbagh said there was no "violation of procedure" in the hanging of Barzan and fellow convict Awad Hamed al-Bander, Saddam's former chief judge, for crimes against humanity over the killings of 148 Shi'ites.
.
But from Morocco to Yemen, ordinary Arabs cast doubt on the official explanation. Some recalled the chaotic and abusive treatment of Saddam Hussein when he was hanged on December 30.
.
Zaid al-Boudani, a shopkeeper in the Yemeni capital Sanaa, said: "I am very sad today, as many other Muslim Arabs are. This execution is part of the revenge campaign going on in Iraq. The way his head was ripped off shows hatred and revenge."
.
The president of Morocco's Human Rights Center described the hangings as a barbaric and vengeful act carried out under external pressure, probably from Iran and the United States.
.
"We had never heard that the head of a hanged person was ripped from his body, only in this case, which mirrors the hatred and violence," said the president, Khaled Charkaoui.
.
Azzam Saleh Abdullah, Barzan's brother-in-law, told Al Jazeera in a telephone call that the Iraqi authorities had not informed the family in advance that the execution was imminent.
.
"We heard the news on television and were shocked. The Iraqi government should have informed us. They know the traditions very well," he added.
.
"As for ripping off his head, this is the Safavids' rancor. They only came to Iraq to commit revenge and shed Iraqi blood. They did not come for democracy or to build a state. May God curse this democracy," he said.
.
'IRAQI BLOOD'
.
"Safavid" is a reference to the dynasty which established Shi'ite Islam as the Iranian state religion from the 16th century and which sometimes controlled parts of Iraq.
.
Hardline Iraqi Sunnis have started using the term to suggest that the Shi'ites are not true Iraqis.
.
Issam Ghazzawi, a Jordanian lawyer who saw Barzan on Friday, said he was convinced the decapitation was deliberate.
.
"His head was cut off after he was hanged to mutilate his body in an a barbaric act of revenge that is against any human values and is vigilante justice by a group of thugs," he said.
.
At the hanging of Saddam, the executioners shouted sectarian taunts at the former president, who was overthrown and captured after the United States invaded Iraq in 2003.
.
The Moroccan Human Rights Association, the main independent human rights body in the North African country, said the hangings were a "criminal political assassination."
.
"The trial of Saddam Hussein and his aides by a pro-U.S. Iraqi court lacks the conditions for a fair trial and makes the verdicts unjust and their hangings a criminal political assassination masterminded by American imperialism," it said.
.
Yemeni bus driver Hassan Mohammad agreed in blaming the U.S. military presence. "Barzan is another victim of the American occupation in Iraq and the way he was executed shows how the Iraqi government is punishing (people) to avenge their rejection of American dominance and occupation," he said.
.
But some Arabs in the Gulf, where Saddam was not popular, said they were happy to see Barzan hang.
.
Ali al-Baghli, a leading Kuwaiti analyst and a former oil minister, said: "Justice has finally been done! ... (Barzan) committed a lot of crimes against humanity and at least he had undergone a legal trial."
.
"This is the rule of law... They deserved what they got. They cannot kill and torture without facing justice," added Mansoor Al-Jamri, editor of the independent Bahraini newspaper Al Wasat.
.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070115/...raq_arabs_dc_1

Felix The Assassin 01-15-2007 07:58 PM

<font color=8fbc8f>Too Cool. We were eating dinner when it was broadcast on the evening news. One beheading for another, rebels 3, <s>US</s> Free Iraq 1!</font>

Timber Loftis 01-16-2007 03:18 PM

Translation: Muslim r-tards are still being r-tarded. News at 11.

PurpleXVI 01-16-2007 09:23 PM

Why does it matter that they're Muslim?

Kakero 01-17-2007 11:21 AM

Was this one on TV too?

johnny 01-17-2007 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kakero:
Was this one on TV too?
Yeah, there is some footage on the web that can be found. Google for it if you want, i've seen it, and it's too disgusting to post it here.

Timber Loftis 01-17-2007 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by PurpleXVI:
Why does it matter that they're Muslim?
Because they tend towards r-tardation.

W00t outright prejudice ftw!! I tried to be open minded, really I did. But the world keeps making me a prejudice asshole.

johnny 01-17-2007 08:38 PM

Then newsreports like this won't do those thoughts any good.....

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_ne...984530,00.html

And of course some footage to make it extra spicey. :D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9MSFbhIG-sk

I copletely agree though, Islam is a retarded religeon, but then again, so are the others.

PurpleXVI 01-18-2007 01:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Timber Loftis:
Because they tend towards r-tardation.

W00t outright prejudice ftw!! I tried to be open minded, really I did. But the world keeps making me a prejudice asshole.

Well, fine, just be one somewhere else. I don't think anyone here has time for bigotry and racism. Throw in your two cents when we're not on a subject where you just launch unfounded attacks on entire religions.

At least Johnny hates all religion, that's some form of equality, and a completely different debate.

Luther 01-18-2007 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by PurpleXVI:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Timber Loftis:
Because they tend towards r-tardation.

W00t outright prejudice ftw!! I tried to be open minded, really I did. But the world keeps making me a prejudice asshole.

Well, fine, just be one somewhere else. I don't think anyone here has time for bigotry and racism. Throw in your two cents when we're not on a subject where you just launch unfounded attacks on entire religions.

At least Johnny hates all religion, that's some form of equality, and a completely different debate.
</font>[/QUOTE]You're not familiar with TL's style yet are you?

Memnoch 01-18-2007 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Luther:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by PurpleXVI:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Timber Loftis:
Because they tend towards r-tardation.

W00t outright prejudice ftw!! I tried to be open minded, really I did. But the world keeps making me a prejudice asshole.

Well, fine, just be one somewhere else. I don't think anyone here has time for bigotry and racism. Throw in your two cents when we're not on a subject where you just launch unfounded attacks on entire religions.

At least Johnny hates all religion, that's some form of equality, and a completely different debate.
</font>[/QUOTE]You're not familiar with TL's style yet are you?
</font>[/QUOTE]I have a feeling he probably is. ;)

General comment - let's try and ease up a bit on the religion bashing. Generalising is usually not a good idea.

[ 01-18-2007, 09:02 AM: Message edited by: Memnoch ]

Timber Loftis 01-18-2007 05:21 PM

I am fair and equal. I hate everybody and insult everyone. And I realize there's a religious discussion moratorium, but let's suffice to say Johnny and I tend to agree on that.

PurpleXVI 01-18-2007 10:13 PM

Yes, well, if your only contribution is to hate and insult everybody, then you're hardly doing much but shoving the debate closer to a flamewar.

It's not a constructive viewpoint or one that adds anything useful.

Luther 01-18-2007 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by PurpleXVI:
Yes, well, if your only contribution is to hate and insult everybody, then you're hardly doing much but shoving the debate closer to a flamewar.

It's not a constructive viewpoint or one that adds anything useful.

That's pretty rich coming from the guy who has been banned for trolling several times on different forums.

Your sentiment is fine, but your delivery needs work.

[ 01-18-2007, 10:41 PM: Message edited by: Luther ]

PurpleXVI 01-18-2007 10:49 PM

Please, that that crap to PM or off of IW. I have no intention of dragging any off-forum problems with me here.

And for the record, I've been banned from one forum for trolling, another because someone I knew trolled and a third because of completely non-trolling-related reasons. Please try to get the truth right, thank you, and from now on, keep this crap in PM. If you think I'm planning some sort of horrible retributive strike against IW for... Letting me leave of my own volition? Then PM the mods. If you think I'm a total dick and you want to tell me so, then PM me and I'll cheerfully ignore you.

Felix The Assassin 01-18-2007 11:03 PM

<font color=8fbc8f>Hmm, TL being portrayed as a bigot, hater, and a shover? Hang around long enough, and you might just get boiled over. This IS TLs arena. And, yea'll, he pretty much summed it up, he hates everybody, and insults everyone.

Take it for what it's worth and move on (get over it). It is not the first time, and surely won't be the last time on this forum somebody got their panties in a uproar.

The rules for current events are a little bit different than elsewhere here on IW. May I direct you to the top four 'sticky' threads, here you will find those rules.

And don't be a:</font>
http://ck.kolivas.org/pictures/troll...for%20hate.jpg

Edit: Darn, whilst I was finding Mr T, you have already been been accosted.

[ 01-18-2007, 11:06 PM: Message edited by: Felix The Assassin ]

PurpleXVI 01-18-2007 11:16 PM

Well, I have no intention of tolerating remarks like "Muslims tend towards r-tardation."

Hating everything is not an argument, it's not part of a debate. Throwing it into arguments here is akin to pointless spam. You also completely misinterpret my posts, I'm not being angry here, his posts aren't going to make me start a flame-war or sputter. But I still intend to refute every statement of that order of ridiculousness and to tell him to take such childishness elsewhere.

Dundee Slaytern 01-19-2007 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Luther:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by PurpleXVI:
Yes, well, if your only contribution is to hate and insult everybody, then you're hardly doing much but shoving the debate closer to a flamewar.

It's not a constructive viewpoint or one that adds anything useful.

That's pretty rich coming from the guy who has been banned for trolling several times on different forums.

Your sentiment is fine, but your delivery needs work.
</font>[/QUOTE]Uncalled for. The fact that PurpleXVI is here means that Ziroc has already given him grace. If you want to be condescending towards another member, I advise you to bring to PM.

Attack the viewpoint, not the person.

If you do not have constructive reasons for replying, then please do not reply.
~~~~ ~~~~

To All,

Please remain on-topic from this point on. Further sniping and backhanded insults will not be viewed favourably, and action WILL be taken.

Cheers.

Timber Loftis 01-19-2007 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by PurpleXVI:
Yes, well, if your only contribution is to hate and insult everybody, then you're hardly doing much but shoving the debate closer to a flamewar.

It's not a constructive viewpoint or one that adds anything useful.

/cry
/wrist

Every forum needs a big middle finger, and since no one else will take the role, I happily assume it. I promise you there is much to appreciate about my tongue-in-cheek stream-of-consciousness devil's advocate point of view. I promise. No, really, just ask me.

PurpleXVI 01-19-2007 01:50 PM

No, every forum does not need a big middle finger.

A devil's advocate is handy, yes, since he makes sure that everyone isn't just sitting in a circle, giving each other handjobs for being so right.

However, you are not being a devil's advocate, you are merely insulting all of the sides involved in the situation, being inflammatory.

If you had somehow managed to tie Sharia law(Which isn't Muslim, but still.) or some part of the Qu'ran into this thing, then you might have had an argument of some sort. Instead, you said nothing. You just said: "Lol, muslims r dumb." How much would I contribute if I replied to the Australian terror threat thread with: "Man, this is all because Australians are retarded." And someone goes: "Why?" And I say: "Because Australians tend to be retarded!"?

Nothing, that's how much.

The devil's advocate makes the unpopular argument, like, say, that Fascism has it's advantages. You're not making an argument.

[ 01-19-2007, 01:52 PM: Message edited by: PurpleXVI ]

Memnoch 01-19-2007 02:00 PM

Ok, enough with the handbagging. Stick to the topic. If you two want to carry on like pork chops, exchange email addresses so you don't bother everyone else. Any more handbagging in this thread and it'll be locked and yellow cards will be issued out (it's been a long time, I have to go find my yellow cards :D ).

I've noticed a bit of Muslim bashing around here lately, let's avoid that. We have a moratorium for a reason - this is it. I was hoping that we could talk about religion-related world events in the Mideast in a sensible manner, but obviously we can't.

Timber (and Johnny), please leave off the namecalling of Muslims. We don't have many Muslim members here, but I'm pretty sure they're not all retards. What you call them in your private lives is your own business. And Neb, leave off Timber. Any future posts of his which concern you from a content perspective, click on the Report Post button and someone will address it in time.

Now let's move on. I hope all posts after this one will be on-topic. As I said if you want to carry on your disagreement, do it offline or via PM. Cheers.

[ 01-19-2007, 02:06 PM: Message edited by: Memnoch ]

Timber Loftis 01-19-2007 02:29 PM

Yeah, on topic....

Empirical evidence suggests that Muslim cultures, once a source of enlightenment, have gone nowhere and added absolutely zero to the world since the fall of the remnants of the Ottoman Empire at the end of WWI. Since that time they have gradually left reason by the wayside and instead backslid into mysogyny, anti-semetism, myth, propaganda.

While the notion of truthiness is a growing concern for America, where so much of what people believe to be true is based on belief and emotion and not facts, it is a way of life in the middle east.

I'll just let Glenn Beck make the arguments for me. Muslim countries have been overrun by extremism, and you need to look at their agenda and means of achieving that agenda:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5422LKhSVTc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vCUC...elated&search=

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6rpgs...elated&search=

Here, he actually uses a Muslim r-tard to help establish their r-tardedness.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqAhR...elated&search=

And, a fine example of r-tardedness, here's President Tommie Ahmadinetard praying for Armageddon.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKcam...elated&search=

Universally, Muslims hate Israel and all jews. Tell me if I've got this wrong, but I've not seen any Muslim groups sticking up for jews.

If they are allowed to universally hate a group of people, so am I.

Muslim societies are a cancor sore upon this planet, anathema to peaceful society, and as I understand it they tend to not only wish and pray for, but also work to bring about.... Armageddon.

They're the new lazy immigrants sucking up social resources in Europe and causing lots of social trouble by routinely beating their wives... which they can't seem to understand is not permissible in our land of infidels. They're the new trailer park trash of Europe.

At their very best, Muslim societies simply offer a haven for our companies where they can pay lower wages for menial labor, like those annoying computer "help" line people we all try to talk to for 5 minutes before saying "give me someone who I can understand, please."

These societies give nothing, accomplish nothing, do nothing, and contribute nothing. They are nothing more than a drain on the rest of the world. The only thing they have worth wanting is the oil some of them happen to be lucky enough to float on top of, and our leaders readily kneel down to perform fellatio to those Muslims, a sickening and disgusting habit that should be done away with... what ever happened to taking what we wanted instead of kissing ass for it? When did we conquerers and empire-builders become such pussies?

I have many more thoughts on this, but not much more time at present, nor the patience to keep trying to organize my thoughts on this issue.

And please note, everything I have said here goes to the socio-economics of Muslim societies -- I have not discussed (I hope) the religion of Muslimism. I think depending on your interpretation of that religion, it could have some problems as well, but perhaps the biggest problem is that there are generally 2 VASTLY different interpretations on that religion --- one of which wants to see the whole world in flames. Not good.

johnny 01-19-2007 03:09 PM

Just for the record, i'm not calling any muslims retards (basically because i don't know that many to begin with, thank goodness for that), but i'm calling Islam retarded, the whole purpose of it. I think religeon as a whole is something we could easily do without, but Islam is king of the hill in this category. But if that cannot be discussed either, i'll just leave it at that, it's all good with me.

johnny 01-19-2007 03:12 PM

Btw...TL pretty much summed it up, couldn't have said it better. Well, perhaps i could, but then i would be crossing a few lines. :D

Morgeruat 01-22-2007 01:42 PM

I also agree with Timber (for the same reasons and more), but then that shouldn't surprise anyone.

Chewbacca 01-25-2007 12:58 AM

Death is an everyday occurance in Iraq and Error has been a central theme since the United States purchased the place a few years back. Who cares if one mere dude's head was ripped off when it probably happens x100 everyday!? Relatively speaking this death is a drop in the death bucket. Really- I can care less about dead Iraqis. Screw them. We got rid of Saddam- who most of them allegedly hated, so now they can screw the place or love the place all they want. It is their's after all. None of my business(like it ever was in the first place- HAHAHAHAHA). What matters now is that Family gets home from that hell- not dead or worst.

[ 01-25-2007, 12:59 AM: Message edited by: Chewbacca ]

robertthebard 01-30-2007 08:57 AM

On the original topic, dead is dead, what difference does it make? Is beheading some kind of insult in Islam? They seem to make use of it when it suits their needs.

PurpleXVI 01-30-2007 09:11 AM

Please don't conflate Al Qaeda or the insurgents with Islam in general. Islam that actually follows the Qu'ran has as much to do with Al Qaeda as Christianity had to do with Waco.

Not all Muslims follow, advocate or even like Sharia law.

Now, as for the beheading, the reason it's an insult is that it obviously shows no one even tried to give the man a dignified death. Don't you think Americans would take it differently whether I killed one or their soldiers in a gunfight or whether I cut open his corpse and used it as a toilet afterwards?

robertthebard 01-30-2007 11:55 AM

No, I wouldn't. If you want to impress me that way, cut him open while he's still alive, and use him for a toilet.

On the dignified death front, just how dignified were the deaths this man ordered? I'm not sure of all the details, but I'd guess that he was convicted in conjunction with the atrocities attributed to Sadam. They could have run him through a meat grinder, as far as I'm concerned, and not done justice for the people that died at his hands, or by his commands.

PurpleXVI 01-30-2007 01:09 PM

If we begin to say: "Well, they started it, so we're allowed to do the same!" then we lose all moral high ground, and we'll essentially be no better than them.

Morgeruat 01-30-2007 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by PurpleXVI:
Please don't conflate Al Qaeda or the insurgents with Islam in general. Islam that actually follows the Qu'ran has as much to do with Al Qaeda as Christianity had to do with Waco.

Not all Muslims follow, advocate or even like Sharia law.

Now, as for the beheading, the reason it's an insult is that it obviously shows no one even tried to give the man a dignified death. Don't you think Americans would take it differently whether I killed one or their soldiers in a gunfight or whether I cut open his corpse and used it as a toilet afterwards?

Peaceful good citizen(by western standards) muslims are that way in spite of their religion, not because of it. Sharia is the system of laws dictated by mohammed to govern his empire based either on his direct word, his example, the koran, hadiths (mohammed's biographies), or sunna (islamic tradition, based primarily off of mohammed's example). Any muslim that dislikes sharia is no muslim at all, and if they proclaimed it at almost any mosque would either be barred as a heretic and infidel, or worse killed as an apostate. Do some reading, those who turn most fervently to "radical" islam are those who get more islam, who study it at great length, take a look at the London bombers, several of them were always radicalized, but most began studying islam more seriously making it a larger part of their life, until it was the only part of their life, and they felt that murdering dozens of innocents and injuring hundreds more was a moral act, because it was based on the instructions of their religion's founder.

Show me any middle eastern country that isn't a shithole and I'll move there, how about Kuwait, where I served for a year, if you're not a muslim and more specifically a Kuwaiti muslim, forget owning property, a car, a business, etc. It is arguably the most westernized country in the middle east and the most modern. It's still a shithole by the standards of anyone I met there (Brit's Aussies, Americans from all over the country, even compared to other assignments like Korea during the spring melt)

Morgeruat 01-30-2007 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by PurpleXVI:
If we begin to say: "Well, they started it, so we're allowed to do the same!" then we lose all moral high ground, and we'll essentially be no better than them.
So we shouldn't have hung the nazi's when we liberated the concentration camps, because obviously it means MacArthur, Bradley, et al were no better than the guys running the camps? There is evil in the world, and to equate destroying evil with being evil serves no one and destroys any ground to work from at all. Moral equivalence be damned.

PurpleXVI 01-30-2007 02:43 PM

Your ability to read be damned, apparently. I'm sorry to say it so bluntly, but that's not what I said at all.

I suggested that their executions be conducted with care and dignity, rather than jeering and ridiculous screw-ups like this. I'm quite sure that no one was throwing stuff at the Nazi high-ups when they were hung for their crimes against humanity.

It's possible to destroy evil in a humane manner. The moment you start taking a few seconds to shoot them in the balls before you shoot them in the head, that's when you're as evil as them. The moment when you point out everyone on their side of the border as being "evil" and nerve gas them all to get the few ones you know are evil, that's when you're as evil as them.

I also suggest you learn something about Islam. Sharia is not dictated by Mohammed and is not part of the Qu'ran. End of story, that's a fact and there's no need to take it any further than that.

Any man who obsesses about his religion and puts it ahead of everything is likely to become a madman and a fanatic. The same goes for a political philosophy. Islam is not some sort of insidious nerve-poison that brings madness if you're exposed to lots of it. Any religion, however, if you put it ahead of everything else in the world, is likely to do more harm than good. There are plenty of Islamic scholars(People who research the Qu'ran, learn it, interpret it, study it.) who are sensible men. Who do not spread fanaticism and hatred against the West.

As for the Muslim countries, maybe you're forgetting that the West has been screwing them over for decades, and then some? They've always been trapped in the middle of power play. And if you want to do it like that, show me any Christian country in the middle ages that wasn't a shithole compared to most of the Muslim countries? It all goes in cycles. The West has been paying for wars in the Middle East and endorsing dictators there. The USSR screwed over the 'Stans hard. Many of South East Asia's Muslim countries are exploited as cheap labour and never given a chance to grow properly.

And with that, I'm gone from this debate. The moment you start equating all Muslims with Sharia law and terrorism, there's nothing there for me to argue with, just a big empty hole for me to throw my words into.

Timber Loftis 01-31-2007 10:44 AM

News flash -- it's not that rare to behead someone during a hanging.

Here's some wikieality on it for you:
Quote:

William Marwood (who was often quoted as saying "Calcraft hanged them, I execute them"), introduced the "long drop". Marwood realised that each person required a different drop, based on the prisoner's weight, which would dislocate the cervical vertebrae resulting in "instantaneous" death.

By a process of (sometimes grisly) experimentation it was discovered that an energy of 1260 foot pounds (1710 joules) would have the desired effect, so the required drop was determined by dividing this figure by the weight of the prisoner: a person weighing 112 pounds would be executed by a drop of 11.25 feet.

The basic formula would be refined as time went on to take account of the prisoner's age, stature, and physical condition, but there were some early mistakes <u>when too great a drop was provided and a decapitation resulted.</u>

Marwood also experimented with the positioning of the knot, and discovered that placing it under the left ear or under the angle of the left jaw would jerk the head backwards at the end of the drop and instantly sever the spinal cord and dislocate the cervical vertebrae.

The development of swift and "clean" methods of hanging were welcomed by prison governors and staff, who were required to witness executions at close distance after the abolition of public executions in 1868.
[ 01-31-2007, 10:45 AM: Message edited by: Timber Loftis ]

Hivetyrant 02-02-2007 04:59 PM

lol@Glenn Beck.

I totally agree with TL's point of view here, these guys are R-tards and should be shot....imo

Actually, being shot would be too painless and quick.

EDIT: At least the extremists

[ 02-02-2007, 05:13 PM: Message edited by: Hivetyrant ]


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2024 Ironworks Gaming & ©2024 The Great Escape Studios TM - All Rights Reserved