Ironworks Gaming Forum

Ironworks Gaming Forum (http://www.ironworksforum.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Discussion (http://www.ironworksforum.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=36)
-   -   Nations Represented in the Coalition Forces (http://www.ironworksforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=78396)

Reeka 03-23-2003 04:06 PM

Of course I know that we have British and Australian forces that have troops present in Iraq. I thought that I heard the there were Swedish and Italian troops present. Velkyn told me that he heard that South Korea is sending 700 Medics and Engineers. And that Japan is considering sending troops in as well.

Has anyone heard of any other troops from any other nations that are present in Iraq?

Cloudbringer 03-23-2003 04:12 PM

Uh...I've heard of BRITISH troops and American troops in combat. Not sure if the Australian troops are engaging Iraqui army divisions. The only military leaders giving 'official' coalition newsbriefs, that I've seen are UK and USA.

Spain is part of the coalition, as best I can tell, but apparently will be helping with humanitarian efforts.

I think most of this can be confirmed at various news sites like CNN etc.

Reeka 03-23-2003 04:18 PM

Australia has a naval presence there and I heard they intercepted Iraqi ships that were loaded with mines to mine the gulf.

Ronn_Bman 03-23-2003 04:40 PM

At a press conference yesterday, or the day before, I did see some high level military officials from countries other than those with troops on the ground in Iraq. Supposedly they are working at command and control facility throughout the Middle East. They were European, but I'm ashamed to admit, I can't remember which nations they were from.

wellard 03-23-2003 05:08 PM

The Australians have several ships in the area and have stopped mines being laid and give covering fire to the British troops landing on the beach.

Our air force has dropped some bombs but are mainly used as guard duties for the mid air tankers and to the spy planes. We also have some spy planes (orions) patrolling the seas.

Our army is mainly (all?) SAS troops that are "deep" within Iraq carrying out "secret missions (sabotage?) and observation duties. The same duties that they carried out to very good effect in Afghanistan. Understandably these troops would not have press with them and therfore will not feature in the CNN or FOX firework displays.

We have not sent many troops, but what we have sent is of a very VERY high quality. Trust me we are not there to peel potatoes ;) And do not forget that if this all goes pear shaped and there is a united Muslim backlash that the worlds biggest Muslim country is sat just a few miles of our northern border. :(

So obviously we are also undoubtedly busy taking precautions protecting ourselves and our other new neighbour "east Timor" whom we liberated from the shackles of some fanatical Muslim extremists causing terror and persecution, who where backed by the Indonesian government. So if you think about it we have a lot to do and are probably streched beyond our capacity.

Davros 03-23-2003 05:21 PM

The SAS units that Wellard was refereeing to have been on forward recon deep in Iraq. They have been identifying bunkers and concealed installations and either taking care of business themselves are calling in the planes to do it for them. According to reports they have been in at least 4 heated exchanges / skirmishes and they took out a missile silo last night. Thus far they have avoided taking casualties themselves.

From all reports the US was very impressed with the performance of this crack unit in Afghanistan, and when it came to asking for Australian support, these guys were at the top of the shopping list.

Reeka 03-23-2003 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Ronn_Bman:
At a press conference yesterday, or the day before, I did see some high level military officials from countries other than those with troops on the ground in Iraq. Supposedly they are working at command and control facility throughout the Middle East. They were European, but I'm ashamed to admit, I can't remember which nations they were from.
I saw this too, Ronn, and one of them, I am pretty sure was from Sweden and the other, I hesitate to say. but I think he said he was Dutch.

Ar-Cunin 03-23-2003 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Reeka:
Of course I know that we have British and Australian forces that have troops present in Iraq. I thought that I heard the there were Swedish and Italian troops present. Velkyn told me that he heard that South Korea is sending 700 Medics and Engineers. And that Japan is considering sending troops in as well.

Has anyone heard of any other troops from any other nations that are present in Iraq?

Neither Sweden (anti-war) nor Italy(pro-war) has any troops in the Gulf.

Denmark has a conventional submarine in the Gulf and a frigate underway (currently in the Red Sea)

The international officers introduced at the press conference included a Dane and a Dutchman - but I'm not sure if Holland has any troops in the Gulf.

Reeka 03-23-2003 06:48 PM

Thank you for clarifying that. They introduced them at the beginning and I was not fully paying atention when they first made the introductions. That is why it is good to come here and have these things cleared up.

wellard 03-23-2003 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Reeka:
Of course I know that we have British and Australian forces that have troops present in Iraq. I thought that I heard the there were Swedish and Italian troops present. Velkyn told me that he heard that South Korea is sending 700 Medics and Engineers. And that Japan is considering sending troops in as well.

Has anyone heard of any other troops from any other nations that are present in Iraq?

As for Japan, I think that its against Japans constitution for it to send troops to war overseas. iirc I think it is policitaly backing the U.S. and Allies in the war.

Yorick 03-24-2003 12:59 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Cloudbringer:
Uh...I've heard of BRITISH troops and American troops in combat. Not sure if the Australian troops are engaging Iraqui army divisions. The only military leaders giving 'official' coalition newsbriefs, that I've seen are UK and USA.

That would be because you're in America Amber. ;) More a statement on media practices than anything else.

As usual the Aussies are in there kicking arse and not getting the international press. :( In WWII they spearheaded many movements in the western front. Numerically small but as Wellard said VERY high quality.

As far as 'official coalition newsbriefs' go:

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/National/story_46972.asp
Quote:

Australian Hornets lead raids in Iraq

Australian FA-18 Hornet fighter jets led bombing raids on identified targets over Iraq overnight, Defence spokesman Brigadier Mike Hannan said.

Brigadier Hannan said the Hornets dropped laser-guided 2,000 pound bombs on the targets.

"The Hornets worked closely with a number of other coalition aircraft during the successful attack," he said.

"During this attack, the Hornets dropped a number of laser-guided 2,000 pound bombs onto a target.

"On completion of the mission, the Hornets returned to base safely."

Brigadier Hannan said no Australian defence force members had been injured in hostilities at this stage.

"All of our people are safe and well," Brigadier Hannan said.
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/National/story_39908.asp
Quote:

SAS has Iraqi platoon destroyed

Australia's elite Special Air Service (SAS) troops called in an airstrike to destroy an Iraqi platoon, Defence Minister Robert Hill said.

"They came across what was interpreted as a platoon of Iraqi military with a number of vehicles," Senator Hill told ABC radio.

"And that was taken out with the assistance of an air strike."

The Australian Defence Force (ADF) has revealed the 150 SAS troops deployed in the Persian Gulf have killed an undisclosed number of Iraqi soldiers in several skirmishes.

The ADF said on Sunday a SAS unit, usually comprising five or six men, directed an air strike against what appeared to be a ballistic missile site.

Senator Hill said the SAS units had little rest.

"They're on a constant reconnaissance mission; their task is to find targets such as ballistic missile sites," he said.

"They either destroyed them themselves or call in air support.

"They don't seem to get a lot of rest, the special forces - it's extraordinary how they do it."

He would not comment on reports that the Australian SAS troops were in or near Baghdad.

He said there had been no Australian military casualties and no Australian had been taken prisoner.

The RAAF FA/18 Hornets and the navy frigate HMAS Anzac had also remained active in fighting.

"Australian forces are continuing to make a significant contribution since this time yesterday," Senator Hill told the Nine Network.

"Our FA/18 fighters have been conducting air strikes, bombing from the air.

"Our ship ANZAC has continued to provide artillery support which has been very much appreciated by the British marines that they've been supporting."

Senator Hill said the best predictions remained that the war would be relatively short.
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/National/story_38533.asp
Quote:

The Australian forces had not suffered any casualties in the war on Iraq and were trying to keep civilian deaths to a minimum, Prime Minister John Howard said.

The US and British forces have both lost men and women in combat but Australia's 2,000 troops were reported to be safe.

"Thus far there have been no casualties sustained by the Australian forces," Mr Howard told parliament.

"There do appear to have been a number of casualties sustained by the United States forces and regrettably some 14-16 British military personnel have died in a series of accidents."

Mr Howard said he was unable to offer a precise number of Iraqi civilian casualties.

Australian cameraman Paul Moran was the first Australian casualty, killed in a suicide bombing in northern Iraq while shooting footage for an ABC story.

Dreamer128 03-24-2003 05:11 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Ar-Cunin:

The international officers introduced at the press conference included a Dane and a Dutchman - but I'm not sure if Holland has any troops in the Gulf.

The officer, Lt Colonel Blom, is in charge of the Dutch patriot defence in Turkey. He had been granted permission to attent a meeting, not knowing that it was a press conference. We are just doing our duty as a member of NATO, and do not provide militairy support in Iraq in anyway.

[ 03-24-2003, 05:12 AM: Message edited by: Dreamer128 ]

Sir_Tainly 03-24-2003 05:18 AM

Poland also has 200 troops in the Gulf, not sure if these are combat troops or more likely a support unit.

Masklinn 03-24-2003 05:20 AM

I've read that only US, UK, Australia, Denmark and Poland has troops in Iraq.
All other countries in the list we had some days ago support US but didnt send any troops.

Cloudbringer 03-24-2003 07:40 AM

Thanks for the articles and info, Hugh! I knew Australia had troops there, just not what they were doing.

Iron_Ranger 03-24-2003 07:54 AM

<font color='white'> Borrowed from another message board-

Albania - committed to sending 70 troops

Australia - committed to sending 2000 troops

Poland - committed to sending 200 troops

Romania - committed to sending 278 troops

UK - committed to sending 45,000 troops
</font>

Charean 03-24-2003 11:21 AM

I heard on a story on Moran on NPR. Quite an amazing journalist and did work that is being quotes years later. Sounds like he was a groundbreaker. He will be missed. :(


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2024 Ironworks Gaming & ©2024 The Great Escape Studios TM - All Rights Reserved