He announced live on his radio show that he would be going to rehab for his painkiller addiction. Maybe thats why he made those ignorant comments about Donovan McNabb, he was all loopy on painkillers.

Yeah, I'm sure that the first two awful games that the Eagles had didn't have anything to do with it right?

Well, at least he still can qualify for a promising career as a conservative housewife. :D

At least Rush never said that blacks don't know how to use punch card ballots in California...

With the ACLU telling blacks and hispanics they are complete idiots, why should he Holy Warrior?

Can you provide us with a link for this?

Yeah, I'm sure that the first two awful games that the Eagles had didn't have anything to do with it right? </font>[/QUOTE]Almost every quarterback to ever play in the NFL has lost two games in a row at some point, and most of the time it wasn't because of an ignorant coaching staff trying to make a scrambling QB a pocket QB. Would you say all quarterback in the NFL are overrated based on that point? Probably not. McNabb is very very talented. I didn't hear overrated when he was going to division championship game. Rush is just a borderline racist, drug addict that knows nothing about football. I hope somone at ESPN got fired for hiring him in the first place.

[ 10-13-2003, 01:43 PM: Message edited by: AzRaeL StoRmBlaDe ]

<font color = lightgreen>I listened to Rush's show back in the very early 1990s; after a couple of years he started getting on my nerves, so I quit listening. The last time I listened to him (some months ago) I realized that gone were the old days of incisive commentary, because he had degenerated into nothing but being a Democrat-basher. :rolleyes: These days, I don't bother giving him any thought...but I must say this disclosure makes for some really jiucy gossip. [img]graemlins/beigesmilewinkgrin.gif[/img]

Why was he an ESPN correspondent, anyway? [img]graemlins/1ponder.gif[/img] How does political commentary become experience needed to land a job as a sports commentator? [img]graemlins/1dizzy.gif[/img] </font>

All I can say about poor delusional Rush is

HARDY HAR HAR!!!!!!!!!

This fine, upstanding man who once proclaimed that drug addicts should be locked in jail and the key thrown away manages to get imself addicted to what is referred to as "Hillbilly Heroin?" The irony of it is too funny to even contemplate...I love it. Now, if we could just get Howard Stern too...

Yeah, I'm sure that the first two awful games that the Eagles had didn't have anything to do with it right? </font>[/QUOTE]Almost every quarterback to ever play in the NFL has lost two games in a row at some point, and most of the time it wasn't because of an ignorant coaching staff trying to make a scrambling QB a pocket QB. Would you say all quarterback in the NFL are overrated based on that point? Probably not. </font>[/QUOTE]Did I say a thing about the Eagles loseing? No I didn't. If I had wanted to say "Yeah, I'm sure that the Eagles loseing their first two games had nothing to do with it" then I would have, don't put words in my mouth. Winning a game, and the QB playing a good game arn't the same thing, look at last weeks Giants - New England game, the giants Collins outperformed Brady substantually in the first half, yet at the end of the half, New England was ahead. Or look at this weeks Giants - Eagles game, again Collins played a better game for the most part, but the Giants still lost. In the latter case, the Giants were done in by their special teams.

Anyway getting back to my point, I didn't say a thing about loseing, I said that the Eagles had awful games. In their first game of the regular season, the Eagles were 2-11 on third down coversions, averaged a little over 3 yards a pass, and had around a 50% pass completion rate. In their second game, they were 3-14 on third down coversions, again averaged a little over 3 yars a pass, and had a little over a 40% pass completion rate.

If you compare that to when McNabb actually looked like he knew how to play football, and you'll notice a huge difference.

[ 10-20-2003, 02:31 PM: Message edited by: Seraph ]

Donut, the reason that the ACLU gave for their attempts to stop the recall was that the punch card ballot was confusing to minorities. I'm sorry but I have used them and they are not confusing. They are rather easy to use.

Well KDogRex, there is a difference between between getting addicted to painkillers because of pain from a back injury and surgery, and some crack head who just wants that high. pain will make you do things you normally wouldn't in an attempt to make the pain go away.

ROFL. GOOD POST! [img]graemlins/thumbsup.gif[/img]

Welcome back KDog! [img]graemlins/happywave.gif[/img] Where you bin?

From the Onion

Limbaugh Says Drug Addiction A Remnant Of Clinton Administration
WEST PALM BEACH, FL—Frankly discussing his addiction to painkillers, conservative talk-show host Rush Limbaugh told his radio audience Monday that his abuse of OxyContin was a "remnant of the anything-goes ideology of the Clinton Administration." "Friends, all I can say is 'I told you so,'" said Limbaugh, from an undisclosed drug-treatment facility. "Were it not for Bill Clinton's loose policies on drug offenders and his rampant immorality, I would not have found myself in this predicament." Limbaugh added that he's staying at a rehab center created by the tax-and-spend liberals.

Oh yeah, Rush never said this either:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=1644266

but since a minority said it, nothing to see here.

and they say there's no media bias. :rolleyes:

Wow, if I hadn't checked the Onion info on Rush blaming the Clinton Admin for his addiction, I would have almost made a very foolish post!!!

DONUT!!!! Good to see you again. For the past couple of years I've been working a strangely scheduled job and didn't have the opportunity to post that often. I see that the board has chenged a bit in my absence (seems to swing a little further to the right than it used to) but all in all it's the same bunch of great people, plus a TON of new great people to get to know!! HI EVERYONE!!!

[ 10-24-2003, 01:08 PM: Message edited by: KDogRex ]

That's all well and good and I see your point, but I don't know if you understand mine. Rush Limbaugh has treated people with contempt who find themselves in a position where they are hooked on drugs in any situation (his comments are well documented) for years, all the while building a drug addiction of his own so severe that he has become implicated in a massive investigation into the black market trafficking of this hillbilly heroin. He is exactly what he has villified for years and they hypocracy of it is that of his own, staunch religious beliefs failing him when he's boasted for years that that's what makes him better than all of us.

p.s.


That's why it's so <font color=steelblue>censored</font> funny!!!!

[ 12-28-2003, 06:57 PM: Message edited by: Larry_OHF ]

It should be noted that the oxy-Crack-in black market is partial fuel by the armed robbery of pharmacies. There were so many robberies around these parts, that pharmacies no longer carry oxycotin on-hand on the advise of the police. According to the signs posted, it takes 24 hours to get a Oxycotin prescription filled.

Rush is not only an addict, but an addict that was allegedly involved in supporting a criminal black market fuel by violence. Its good thing he is seek helping, but it serves no one to gloss-over exactly what he was involved in unless you want to practice denial and selective reasoning. Can't blame the liberals for this one.

[ 10-24-2003, 01:50 PM: Message edited by: Chewbacca ]