I dodged no question. I refused to answer your loaded question because it is based on a false premise and becasue you have no credibility to ask.

Of course, if one actually reads my posts rather than jump to the direst conclusions you may find nuggets like this one:


From one of chewy's posts earlier in the thread:
So, in a way, I did actually answer the question a few posts back, I just did not answer your question magik.

Settle down fellas. I've had enough of the sniping, backbiting, bitching and the pedantic circular "you did, no I didn't, yes you did" rubbish you've been laying on each other. Both of you are going off for a week if you don't pull your heads in and sort yourselves out, end of story. Capish?

<font face="COMIC Sans MS" size="3" color="#7c9bc4">
I will ignore your direct insult/attack/whatever it was supposed to be.

I do want to note that
"Of course I do not support their violent actions, insurgent or terrorist,"
is not an answer to the question,
Are you For or Against US forces? wich I will admit I muddied up because it was also a question of Are you FOR or Against the terrorists in Iraq. I should ahve asked the questions seperately.

You didn't answer either question even though I didn't ask them seperately.
</font>

[ 06-22-2004, 01:11 PM: Message edited by: MagiK ]

<font face="COMIC Sans MS" size="3" color="#7c9bc4">
Read and noted Memnoch. I didn't see your post untill after I had already posted my previous post....errr that sounded convoluted but I hope you got the gist.</font>

Well, Memnoch I object to the insinuation ( in the form of a loaded question) that I support terrorists and do not support my troops.

This is why I started a whole other thread wondering if this line of "discussion" was acceptable on the forum because it seems to me that not only is it personal and off-topic, it also accomplishes nothing.

I'll heed your warning and let it lie.

i would like to bring this back to an important point.

1) MOST of the rebels in iraq are terrorists, confirmed.

2) insurgents are just as illegal in terms of war crimes as terrorists are.

my informative 2 cents for now...

I think you've made your objection abundantly clear, Chewy, in numerous posts around the place. You've been given the opportunity to do so, and you've done so. Now I suggest you get over it and move on. I've been called a lot of things in my life, online and to my face, and they haven't made me a worse person or anything. For the record I don't think you're a terrorist supporter, and no matter what you post my opinion of you won't change. What other people think of you doesn't change the kind of person you are, mate.

Now I expect both of you to do as you've just said. I'm about to go to bed (3:15am here) and if I have to come back tomorrow and find more rubbish happening here I will be really really cheezed off.

Cheers. [img]smile.gif[/img]

[ 06-22-2004, 01:38 PM: Message edited by: Memnoch ]

Grapes? Whoa Hold the horses I know using a feather in Kinky and using the whole chicken is Perverted But what in the world is using Grapes? ;)

<font face="COMIC Sans MS" size="3" color="#7c9bc4">
Perhaps the Grapes of Wrath?

I know if the wrong person grabs my grapes I am more than a little wrathful....</font>

[ 06-22-2004, 01:52 PM: Message edited by: MagiK ]

Is it possible for someone to be against US action AND against terrorist acts in Iraq ?

Or are we still in the "If you're not with us, you're against us" kind of stuff ?

And like many others I'm kinda disapointed by the title you chose TL. I couldnt believe it came from you !

Disapointed but not very surprised though.