![]() |
<font color = lightgreen>The Muslim world is like the Christian world in the Middle Ages and Renaissance--you cannot separate the society from the religion. There is no difference.</font>
|
I agree, and I think the sooner people stop belly aching about the small stuff, and stand back and look at the whole thing that way, the sooner we can just do what has to be done, and be done.
|
<font face="Verdana" size="3" color="#009999">We have freedom of speech here and the publishers of the cartoons would most likely got away with publishing the cartoons the first time.
The second publications however they would have had people tossed in jail because the intent of the second publications was different as it was to promoted hatred, not to demonstrate freedom of the press as some claim. Here the publishers were not just publishing a cartoon to show a point by being funny but behaving as if they were members of the NAZI's or KKK. Here you can basically publish what you want as long as it is not intended to promote hatred. So NAZI's, or KKK can basically not publish things that spread hatred. The Muslims in Canada were upset about the cartoons but thay also upset about the way the muslims in the rest of the world behaved with the violent demonstrations saying something along the lines of "While we found the cartoon offensive, the way the muslims are demonstrating in other countries is just proveing what that artist depicted as true, and they are creating a worse image of our religion than any cartoon." </font> [ 02-06-2006, 06:13 PM: Message edited by: pritchke ] |
An article by John Simpson, written in his typically measured style. Worth a read, it gave me pause for thought.
One of the comments to the article probably deserves to be mentioned, a Brad Leeger from Nouadhibou: Quote:
[ 02-06-2006, 06:18 PM: Message edited by: shamrock_uk ] |
The whole thing is a bit strange considering there have been pictures made Muslims depicting Mohammed, sometimes with a veil and sometimes without.
|
[color=blue]
The first deaths have been reported as a result of all the protests, which have definitely turned violent and have been hijacked by the lunatic fringe pushing their own moronic, extremist agenda. I'm wondering if any of these idiots torching embassies have even seen the cartoons. By their moronic acts they have lost the moral high ground and are now being seen as the "bad guys" in this whole situation. What's even more curious is that these cartoons were first printed FIVE months ago, and we hardly heard anything about them. There were some minor protests in Denmark but that was it. But there are some revelations now that a number of extremist imams actually travelled to the Middle East to whip up a frenzy of anger and hatred about them (apparently some new cartoons "appeared" in the collection that was shown by these imams in the Middle East which didn't appear in the paper originally, which were much worse). If this is true then it's a VERY LOW ACT from these imams, to try and whip people up into hysteria. One more thing - in the article below it says that protesters threw rocks at passing cars?!? What's that all about. That's just mindless violence. I'd be pretty bloody pissed off if I was driving past a protest and some knobs chucked some rocks at my car just because I happened to be in the area. After reading this stuff my feelings have moved from sympathy for Muslims for what the Danish and Norwegian paper did to disgust for the boofheads who are ruining it all for you guys with this kind of moronic behaviour. It's this kind of mindless stuff which gives Islam such a bad name, and to shamrock's point I feel it's the responsibility of Islam's moderate leaders to condemn such behaviour as it's only harming their image and their cause. I know it's important to have solidarity with brothers of the faith, but it's more important to remain true to your values and to the concept of right and wrong. And what's happening now is definitely wrong and should be condemned, simple as that. Quote:
|
Quote:
We have a problem though when people have different ideas of right and wrong...if only the real world was as black and white! Personally I wish they'd sit back and let someone's infidel status be determined in the afterlife, if it exists. Let whichever God you happen to believe in do the hard work. That way we in the corporeal world can get some peace whilst radical Muslims can relax and stop witch-hunting, secure in the knowledge that us in the infidel world will be getting a good roasting when we die. See...everybody wins :) [ 02-06-2006, 08:40 PM: Message edited by: shamrock_uk ] |
Quote:
|
Ok, now I'm not all that up on my Islam stuff, but in Christianity, the sinner goes to hell, right? Is it a priest's job to accelerate the process? That's what it seems like these Imams are pushing for. I think it comes full circle to this; we can push for peace all we want to. The fact of the matter is, Islam wants no peace with us. Our very existence is a threat to their way of life.
|
Finally, something more concrete on the 'other images' circulating in the Middle-East:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:09 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2024 Ironworks Gaming & ©2024 The Great Escape Studios TM - All Rights Reserved