Orbost |
05-17-2005 11:48 PM |
Quote:
Originally posted by Memnoch:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Lanesra:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Memnoch:
On another note, how does Glazer expect to get 100% control of the club if 25% of it is in the hands of supporters who hate his guts? He's bought out the big investors like McManus etc and now has close to 75% I heard. But how can he compel the remaining 25% to sell?
|
when he gets 75% he can take the shares off of the stock exchange. he can decide not to pay any dividends so the shares will just be scrap paper. when he gets 90% he can force the other 10% to sell to him at 300p per share. if they don't sell they lose all value.
</font>[/QUOTE]So basically if he controls 75% he basically owns the club, is that right? If he doesn't pay dividends, turning the remaining 25% of shares into scrap, wouldn't that lead to a revaluation of the club? Sounds kind of strange. </font>[/QUOTE]When he owns 75% of the shares, he has total control of the club. Any issues that need a shareholder vote, only need 75% of the vote to be approved. Therefore the shareholders of the remaining 25% have no influence over how the club is run. Glazer could, if he chose, delist the company (ie turn it back into a private company), and this would mean that the minority shareholders do not have a market on which to sell their shares. If he owns 90% of the shares, he can force the remaining shareholders to sell their shares to him.
The fans may be upset, but they have to accept the fact that as soon as the club listed (turned into a plc), it was effectively for sale. Rather than complaining that a yank has now come in and bought lots of shares, they should have organised themselves years ago. If the fans had between them bought 25.1% of the shares, they would hold a blocking shareholding that would have severely restricted the ability of Glazer to control the club, and probably dissuaded anyone else from trying to buy the club.
|