if i had a ferrari i would definately drive it. Maybe if you were a collector you wouldnt, but then your just a rich *******!! Also you dont have to get a brand new one, ok so you might think 2nd hand would suck, but at least you could get enjoyment doing it up.

Neither, the Enzo just looks silly and Lambos are just way over the top.

Gieven a wide-open choice of supercars - definitely Porsche.

<font color="white">Well, I'm sure these two recent models are good but it can't be compared to the classic Ferraris and Lamborghinis.

Sure, the <font color="red">Enzo</font color> looks great( if you like unusually placed bulges, sacrificing aerodynamics over practicability ) but it lack the "Ooomph" factor of the <font color="orange">Ferrari 365 GTB @ Daytona </font color>(circa 1968-73) that was known as the world's fastest car in its heyday (max speed 174 mph) or even the beautifully sculpted <font color="yellow">Ferrari Dino 246 GT </font color>(circa 1969-74).

The <font color="lightgreen">Murciealago</font color> on the other hand looks a lot better than its predecessors such as the boxy <font color="cyan">Countach 5000S</font color>. Even the <font color="deepskyblue">Diablo</font color> looks dated compared to the new <font color="lightgreen">Murciealago</font color>. Despite this fact, in my opinion its nothing compared to the sheer grace and beauty of the <font color="pink">Lamborghini Miura </font color>(circa 1966-72).

They sure don't make cars like they used to.

</font color>

[ 07-15-2003, 02:48 AM: Message edited by: Finn ]

If I actually had my CHOICE of supercars it'd be an easy one...

M.B. CLK-GTR.

Johnn!
Yes what is it?
Pleas give this gentleman here one Murcielago,one Enzo and one Bently please!
Ok...
You take credit cards?
No obly cash!
Ok name your price!
660.000€+400.000€+600.000€=1.660.000€ good sir...
Here you go!

</font>[/QUOTE]Well I was thinking of the topic "Ferrari VS Lamborghini".