Bungleau |
12-17-2006 11:37 PM |
Quote:
Originally posted by Illumina Drathiran'ar:
You know, I was always uncomfortable with possessives ending in ess. I prefer to avoid it completely. Instead of talking about the love of Jesus, for example, I'll say "Christ's love." Here, I would say "Santa's kringle" but something might be lost. The kringle of Kris? "Kris' kringle" seems to be accepted, but it upsets my nerves and I always have to go lie down for a little while after I'm forced to write something like that.
<font color=yellow>I usually have to go kill something, preferably in a game... [img]smile.gif[/img] </font>
Also, I get the feeling that it changes from country to country. I seem to recall hearing that Americans can say "Kris' kringle" but in England the rule might be "Kris's kringle." This is similar to the rule of commas in quotations... Again, I'm not sure, but I was under the impression that the American rule would be:
The flavors we can select are "Cherry," "Strawberry," and "Peach."
While I was under the impression that elsewhere the rule was:
The flavors we can select are "Cherry", "Strawberry", and "Peach".
I myself use the latter, as it seems more correct to me in an intrinsic sort of way.
|
I use the latter version as well. I was taught, many moons ago, that the punctuation (commas, periods, question marks, and so on) go inside the quotes if they're pertinent to what's being quoted.
For instance...
"Where are you going?" he asked.
Is the answer "ten", "twenty", or "Choc"?
In another variation, the comma before the conjunction (or in that last case) is apparently no longer needed. I asked that question of someone who's a published grammar snob (and whose name I can't remember!), and he said that putting it there is an old grammatical style from some thirty years ago or so.
[ 12-17-2006, 11:41 PM: Message edited by: Bungleau ]
|