Ironworks Gaming Forum

Ironworks Gaming Forum (http://www.ironworksforum.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) (http://www.ironworksforum.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=28)
-   -   GIFs and JPEGs (http://www.ironworksforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=92326)

Variol (Farseer) Elmwood 11-24-2004 05:51 AM

dplax got me fixed up with my Dragonfly and now I have the program he suggested. I don't have much of a clue as to how to use it, but I'll mess around with it.
I was a bit surprised that it lost detail by getting smaller. I thought that would make the image sharper?

LennonCook 11-24-2004 06:12 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Callum:
An I wasn't converting from PNG... from BMP
<span style="color: lightblue">Are you sure of that? Most of the images at the site you posted are either GIF or PNG.
On a side note, do not ever pay attention to the file "extension". It is useless. It is crap. It does not control what type of file it is, nor does it necesarily reflect it. To find out what type of file something realy is, look in Firefox's View Page Info (either through the context menu, or the Tools menu). On the Media tab, it will list every file on the page, and the details include the type that the file is being served as. This is usually right, because it controls (in all non-IE browsers) what the browser treats it as.

dplax 11-24-2004 07:02 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Variol (Farseer) Elmwood:
dplax got me fixed up with my Dragonfly and now I have the program he suggested. I don't have much of a clue as to how to use it, but I'll mess around with it.
I was a bit surprised that it lost detail by getting smaller. I thought that would make the image sharper?

It must have lost detail, because it wasn't made smaller and being kept in proportion at the same time. IW has a limit of 225*155 pixels for a sig and I had to downsize the sig to that. Since it did not have the same proportions, one of the sides needed to be compressed a bit more than the other. This might have caused loss of detail. Also an image might become less detailed when you make it smaller as you have less pixels, to include the same amount of detail.

Variol (Farseer) Elmwood 11-24-2004 07:17 AM

You probably noticed I inverted the colours of my sig. I had to guess at the percentage to reduce the pic because when I enter the 225 the other number changes too. So I couldn't just type in the new size. Is there an easier way to achieve that?

dplax 11-24-2004 07:21 AM

If you uncheck preserve aspect ratio then you can enter the size you want.

[ 11-24-2004, 07:22 AM: Message edited by: dplax ]

Variol (Farseer) Elmwood 11-24-2004 07:46 AM

Oh, ok, I'll check that. I've been messing with it a bit and getting more familiar with it. :D

Iron Greasel 11-24-2004 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by LennonCook:
<span style="color: lightblue">Iron Greasal - Bloated? GIMP? Wow. Apparently you and I define "bloat" differently. [img]smile.gif[/img] Infact, the only problem with GIMP is that its interface is kindof wierd. But, you get used to it. All I would want from it would be to have a multi document interface...
Well, by bloated I mean that from those 17 grillion utilities and thingies, I use 10 or so. It has so much that I don't need.

And what is this "multi document interface"? What does it do?

[ 11-24-2004, 08:34 AM: Message edited by: Iron Greasel ]

Callum 11-24-2004 10:29 AM

Well I have absolutely no clue what the Hell any of GIMP does... but I'll teach myself... slightly hindered by the fact that my help files haven't installed...

Beaumanoir 11-24-2004 02:13 PM

Save everything as PNG format. Easy.

LennonCook 11-24-2004 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Iron Greasel:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by LennonCook:
<span style="color: lightblue">Iron Greasal - Bloated? GIMP? Wow. Apparently you and I define "bloat" differently. [img]smile.gif[/img] Infact, the only problem with GIMP is that its interface is kindof wierd. But, you get used to it. All I would want from it would be to have a multi document interface...

Well, by bloated I mean that from those 17 grillion utilities and thingies, I use 10 or so. It has so much that I don't need.

And what is this "multi document interface"? What does it do?
</font>[/QUOTE]<span style="color: lightblue">Multi document interface = more than one image open in a single window. Tabs, basically. The only think that bothers me about the interface realy is how many windows it opens. I would like the option to have a more conventional view, with a fixed-position toolbox. But, from what I've read online, the developers are reluctant to change it, even in the way of giving a choice. But, we can't have everything. [img]smile.gif[/img]
Re the bloat aspect, I see what you mean, kindof. But to me, bloat is more about memory footprint and feature creep. Ok, sure, GIMP has hundreds of features, but the developers don't seem to have put all of them in because "more features == better", but rather because "these features == better".


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2024 Ironworks Gaming & ©2024 The Great Escape Studios TM - All Rights Reserved