From an observing chopper or spyplane, you'd barely be able to see faces. Besides, if the troops were destroying a settlement, there wouldn't be many survivors to tell people otherwise.

From an observing chopper or spyplane, you'd barely be able to see faces. Besides, if the troops were destroying a settlement, there wouldn't be many survivors to tell people otherwise.</font>[/QUOTE]Nowadays they can registrate what brand of cigarettes a soldier is smoking from the skies. If they think they can get away with this, they're making a big mistake.

The fact that it was a Washington source, must say something. The media just reports what they are told.

Like Washington never lied...

Regardless of whether is it or is not true, That does not take away the fact that we only guess to its purpose.
We are not certain that Saddam had othered them for this purpose
thats washingtons interpetation
but we cant actually say that washington is unbaised can we?
after all they are trying to get into war with iraq for 5 months
maybe this is just another attempt to convince the security counsil to attack
Especially after Blix' report wasnt good for the American war cause\
it's a lot cheaper then bribary i can imagine

What? Doesn't Sadam think that British and American troops are capable of commiting atrocities on their own? I'm sure their will be a ton of them, number one being going to war without a second resalution..

I can see this is alread into the 'troops' and war scenario so it will be moving to the war forum.