![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I am sure you blame the deaths if any on the US and UN sanctions...but how is it that Saddam has money enough to maintain his military and he is still buying equipment from russia...wouldnt it be better to blame the guy who is misappropriating the money?</font> [ 01-20-2003, 09:47 AM: Message edited by: MagiK ] |
Quote:
And I sure Saddam can think of a very good reason to maintain his military - the forign 'horde' standing on the border ;) P.S. Got the number (ca. 1.5 million) from a very reliable radio-program - so I don't have a written scource. P.P.S. What weapons from Russia?? |
Quote:
|
Magik is correct on the Iraqi military make up. The majority of equipment is Soviet, or Chinese modified Soviet. A small bit is French.
|
Ar-Cuinin you are right. The sanction to irak is wrong, like other countries.
Why Cuba or Irak has a sanction?. Why Sudafrica not?, They attacked angolia, and the united states didnt do anything. They say that Irak has destruccion massive weapons (The inspectors havent found any), but USA have this weapons too. Well Inspectors have found weapons, well it's true if other country say that they will attack, you must defend. Irak its the country who get the money for themself, for education, and others. And they dont like USA, and they sell the oil more expensive, the oil is them, they can sell more expensive to USA if they want to. USA sell weapons to other countries more expensive to get more money, and any country attack them. What's wrong then? Usa is in crisis before 11 of september, and if they'll get the irak's oil, then they will be better. Moreover in summer 2001 the United States of America said that they will attack to Afganistan and irak, but they havent any reasons to attack them, and two month more late was the 11 of September... what does mean? I dont know... I must say one more thing... Do you remember 1969? Usa wanted to attack Cuba. USA did a plan, they would attack some places in Miami, they would destroy any US airplanes when this planes would fly on Cuba, and they would say that Cuban attacked in first time, the world would say: Cuba is guilty, and they would attack this country with world help. Moreover in the 19th century, USA blowed up an USA's ship near Cuban's beach, for steal this island to us (Spain) and they said that we attacked United States of America, but Cuban wanted to be free, without Spain and USA. What is your opinion? SHAIDE |
Quote:
It wasn't purposely destroyed to give cause in Cuba and wasn't needed as a cause. Dead American's and threatened economic interests had already provided cause. I don't claim the US was being completely altruistic in helping Cuba revolt against Spain, but the Cubans were freed of Spanish rule as they hoped, and did benefit under US administration, and were given their freedom from the US without revolution. EDIT - In 1976, Adm. Hyman Rickover of the U.S. Navy mounted yet another investigation into the cause of the Maine disaster. His team of experts found that the ship's demise was self-inflicted--likely the result of a coal bunker fire. There are those, however, who still maintain that an external blast was to blame. Some people, it seems, just won't let you forget the Maine. Source [ 01-21-2003, 10:13 AM: Message edited by: Ronn_Bman ] |
Quote:
The economy was slumping headed to recession. That certainly isn't good news, but it is far from a crisis. The economy is cyclic. It has ups followed by downs and that's just the way it works, so crisis? Not hardly. How will the US "be better", in the sense of your crisis statement, after an Iraqi war? We won't get their oil unless we buy it. Even if US troops march down the streets of Bhagdad we won't get to keep any of their oil. Could you provide links to the US threats against Afghanistan prior to September 11th? I don't remember any, and Afghanistan doesn't have any oil, so what would the purpose have been? ;) As far as Iraq, I remember that being talked about in the Spring, but guess what? Saddam had been in violation of UN sanctions for a decade, so it shouldn't be too surprising. Maybe you should be upset with him for not feeding his people? He's a dictator, so it's his country. [img]smile.gif[/img] As to the sanctions starving people, see my earlier post. :D |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:25 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2024 Ironworks Gaming & ©2024 The Great Escape Studios TM - All Rights Reserved