Quote:
Originally posted by Luvian:
Of course not.
|
It does sound silly if you put it that way, but it's explained with a rather clever hypothesis (which is nonetheless based on pseudo-science). Furthermore, it seems to have some satisfied customers, so it's got to have a redeeming factor of sorts.
Some believe that one who uses this technique gains knowledge only from all the parts of the procedure EXCLUDING the mystical photoreading itself (which the author states is the core of the technique). The full procedure does have some clever methods to grasp the contents of a book, which perhaps make the reader (a bit too) confident in knowing them.
I, however, am yet undecided on the matter. [img]tongue.gif[/img]
|