Aelia Jusa |
12-28-2003 06:37 PM |
Quote:
Originally posted by Dreamer128:
Well, how many people really die of disease in the first world?
|
Most of them I believe. Heart disease and cancers are the biggest killers in Australia AFAIK.
I think some clarification of 'cure' is necessary. Does this mean that medicines will be available to treat all diseases successfully, so people will still get the diseases but they will be treatable and non-fatal? Or that we will have vaccines for all diseases? Or that the diseases will be eradicated entirely? Certainly my answer would depend on which of these is meant.
Further, will the 'cures' be available to everyone? For example, the progression and severity of AIDS in the first world has been markedly improved in the last few years by drugs. These would be of enormous benefit to the millions of AIDS sufferers in Africa, however they are not available to the vast majority. How about cost - would they be expensive to buy even in developed countries? A situation where cures were available only to the privileged would not be palatable to me.
Finally, who would this child be? Is anyone here volunteering their child (or themselves)? [img]graemlins/idontagreeatall.gif[/img]
|