I think if you're in the first couple hundred, then we all went to the "new" forum at about the same time. I think I'm about 100 or so, but I was on the first day...oh those reckless hours of trying to keep up with the eight robot posters that we call Cloudbringer... [img]smile.gif[/img]

BK

No one. I believe this came up a few months or so ago, and if I remember correctly, there is no member #1. Something to do with the software used for these forums I guess.

Yorick was #7 IIRC...

i think that [img]graemlins/choc.gif[/img] is number 1 actually [img]tongue.gif[/img]

The topic came up yesterday actually ;) http://www.ironworksforum.com/ubb/no...;f=10;t=008329

<font color="gold">We should get the 'Member Search'-option back. Then we could all find out who are the earliest members, if that is so important to someone. [img]smile.gif[/img] </font>

<font color="cyan">Was that sarcasm??

Hope not. No, I was just wonderin, cos I saw Alicats number and thought: Gee, thats low!</font>

Hmmmm...it's a possibility! ;)

Well, the lowest numbers are the "blueboarders" since we're the first ones to convert to the new board, but the order really doesn't matter for the reasons stated above. I guess the first 500 numbers are pretty much the "blueboarders", then after that, will be the ones who joined in after March 2001.

-Sazerac

[ 05-17-2002, 01:47 PM: Message edited by: Sazerac ]

I STILL say it's [img]graemlins/choc.gif[/img] . That's my story, and I'm stickin' to it! [img]graemlins/laugh2.gif[/img]

-Saz

Hmmm Seems to me, that low member numbers is a form of class system, I thought we didn't want any differentiation between the users? If personalized or special Avatars are verboten then why are User numbers permitted to be used to make us higher number people feel less worthy?

Ok this isn't how I feel about the issue...I really don't care ...just thought Id ask the question since I am curious about the thoughts of those who were most opposed to the idea of special memberships.