khazadman |
05-08-2002 12:39 PM |
Quote:
SS wasn't 100%gang of rapists and such. If some really did that, should we tell the entire army was a gang of rapists?
|
actuall the incidence of rape by the western armies,both allied and german,were rare.this is because they were highly diciplined.the soviets on the other hand were the exact opposite.they were undiciplned and brutal.but war on the eastern front was a brutal thing.hell,most soviet civilian deaths were at the hands of the soviet army and kgb divisions as they reconquered territory.
Quote:
Someone in holland, who said SS was full of killers and was an immoral thing, should be very f**king shamed! Holland gave the most troops to the SS (50 000), maybe except to germany. You should look it up and tell it to everyone you know.
|
yeah,that would be the 23rd ss panzer division,nederland.and yes they were one of the better ss units,having earned 19 knights crosses of the iron cross..but you seem to be missing the point here.they were fighting for the country that had conquered them!
the estonians on the other hand were fighting for their liberators.and they had the 20th waffen grenadier division der ss,estnische.this title means that they were not part of the general ss,they were more like mercenaries.and they would only have been tolerated as long as the war was being fought.
Quote:
Why would you flame Uss? Because he was in the wrong side, yes? Well, anyone, who tells him he's nazi because he didn't think he'd like to be in the side of Americans, English nor the russians when talking bout the war, should shut up.
|
we will continue to tell him he is wrong because he IS WRONG!just because you choose to fool yourselves doesn't mean we will do the same.
and f.gottwald you are absolutely right.
|